From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753374AbYIXJQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:16:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751834AbYIXJQ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:16:27 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:43301 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751216AbYIXJQ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:16:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=APT8K1tZ1Jho2KIhLA95TmrOmzbthEqAIEkADPu/OASGWAyonBPkqmryMM1taHePaq XmTrYLppCVhrAqxB1Hv23feQqKoNd1x66qovrEcraGo3E6ZhapqiWJQw7Hu7f+IdZIxz +BoDIMMbRf1kRSg7yrW/z9xzpXsksPX3F3h4I= Message-ID: <21d7e9970809240216m4a93a339sb51a5928fcb5f6fb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:16:24 +1000 From: "Dave Airlie" To: "David Miller" Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, david.vrabel@csr.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, chrisl@vmware.com In-Reply-To: <20080924.020116.193720569.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017@mail.gmail.com> <20080924.003638.71148740.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251@mail.gmail.com> <20080924.020116.193720569.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:01 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:59:34 +1000 > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David Miller wrote: >> The driver seems quite happy to access the NVRAM, I think Thomas has >> some backtraces that show >> it clearly doing silly reentrant things... > > I don't dispute that the locking is dodgy and likely needs to be fixed > like e1000. > > I'm asking what userland tool or kernel event is triggering the nvram > access. > > It shouldn't even touch the thing after probing and initializing > the card. Hopefully tglx can supply some traces, I think getting an interrupt during device startup can possibly access the nvram http://www.tglx.de/~tglx/wtf2.txt seems to suggest bad things could happen. Dave.