From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753244AbYI3CjR (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:39:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751213AbYI3CjH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:39:07 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.229]:64010 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751073AbYI3CjF (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:39:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wmkysycc7lSLsYEBK/f1xgrUn3V/ywu8juKuQatFmUxhcvSzWM2V3Sl3iXPmlweLe2 gi7tFh55myDs0hvl5+6/aM6sidoIY4gLwozfS881j+vZHyYT3tYVpaBZrjzQsL07Fqek d0pqE+Obfq5Y3s2MqIIgkPSKEba+Cqi4Bfzis= Message-ID: <21d7e9970809291939r51a728c8ye865e19dffac5bd6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:39:03 +1000 From: "Dave Airlie" To: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8 Cc: "Jiri Kosina" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , jesse.brandeburg@intel.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <21d7e9970809291859s5bff81e3ue0f63402c2ad422d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> If it is X related then its both a kernel + X server issue, the e1000e >> driver opens the barn door, the X server drives the horses through it. > > Are you sure? There was a mandriva report abou NVM corruption on an e100 > too (that one apparently just caused PXE failure, the networking worked > fine). Well from a purely empirical standpoint, I've been running new X against that laptop for a long time, and others have the same laptop, so I think its a problem with the e1000e driver putting the card into a state which allows X to do bad things. I think X maybe causing issues on other hw, like e100 and some realtek.. Also when we say X I think it looks like Intel driver interaction issues, as I said I'm running the same stuff on my ATI gpu laptop with e1000e and haven't had any problems. But I'm leaving this up to Intel, I don't think HP will take it too kindly if I keep returning my laptop. Dave.