mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeon: use vmalloc instead of kmalloc
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:42:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21d7e9970906230442n3dcfeff8le0ffc3b8ea0c3bd0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245756936.19816.1652.camel@twins>

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra<peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 19:26 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> We don't need to allocated contiguous pages in cs codepath
>> so use vmalloc instead.
>
> Best would be to not require >PAGE_SIZE allocations at all of course.

It gets messy when you have copy from user and spinlocks, it would be nice
to just parse the userspace PAGE_SIZE at a time, but it would mean dropping
a lock we probably need to hold.

> But barring that, it would be great to have something like:
>
>  ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
>  if (!ptr)
>    ptr = vmalloc(size);

we have a drm_calloc_large workaround already for the Intel driver which also
need this.
>
> Also, how long do these allocations live? vmalloc space can be quite
> limited (i386) and it can fragment too.

Only an ioctl lifetime so they aren't that bad. We however do have some vmaps
that might be quite large, mainly the fbcon framebuffer (up to 8MB in
some cases)

Dave.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22 17:26 Jerome Glisse
2009-06-23 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-23 11:42   ` Dave Airlie [this message]
2009-06-23 12:23     ` Jerome Glisse
2009-06-23 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-23 15:14     ` Thomas Hellström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21d7e9970906230442n3dcfeff8le0ffc3b8ea0c3bd0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®