mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, joelaf@google.com, joel.opensrc@gmail.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: Allow early detect of specific features
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 13:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21e20c10-a2f2-c68f-aedf-b53836bc622e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521120644.g527aawkutf3etzq@holly.lan>



On 21/05/18 13:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:45:22PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 21/05/18 12:35, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Currently it is not possible to detect features of the boot CPU
>>> until the other CPUs have been brought up.
>>>
>>> This prevents us from reacting to features of the boot CPU until
>>> fairly late in the boot process. To solve this we allow a subset
>>> of features (that are likely to be common to all clusters) to be
>>> detected based on the boot CPU alone.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>>> [julien.thierry@arm.com: check non-boot cpu missing early features, avoid
>>> 			 duplicates between early features and normal
>>> 			 features]
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>
>> nit: Since this is completely different from what Daniel started with,
>> you could simply reset the author to yourself. The boot CPU feature was
>> added keeping this user in mind.
> 
> Agree! It's no longer my patch.
> 
> If you want to retain any credit than Suggested-by: would make quite
> sufficient.
> 

Good point, I didn't think of that.

I'll change this after I get other reviews for this version.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> The patch as such looks good to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>> index 9d1b06d..e03e897 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>>> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static void cpu_copy_el2regs(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
>>>    	{
>>>    		.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
>>>    		.capability = ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF,
>>> -		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
>>> +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
>>>    		.matches = has_useable_gicv3_cpuif,
>>>    		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
>>>    		.field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT,
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>

-- 
Julien Thierry

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-21 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-21 11:35 [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: Allow early detect of specific features Julien Thierry
2018-05-21 11:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-21 12:06     ` Daniel Thompson
2018-05-21 12:10       ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC sysregs to implement IRQ masking Julien Thierry
2018-05-24 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: Detect current view of GIC priorities Julien Thierry
2018-05-21 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] arm64: Add support for pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21e20c10-a2f2-c68f-aedf-b53836bc622e@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joel.opensrc@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®