From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751796AbbJEQ4h (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:56:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:46082 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751382AbbJEQ4g (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:56:36 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,639,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="304383111" From: Ian Jackson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <22034.43969.711116.77647@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:33 +0100 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: Fengguang Wu , Valentin Rothberg , Dan Carpenter , Mel Gorman , Steven Rostedt , Johannes Thumshirn , Konstantin Ryabitsev , "Jonathan Corbet" , Lars Kurth , "Stefano Stabellini" , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Robert Schweikert , , Juergen Gross , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Joerg Roedel , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Wiki for automatic reports / fixes In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luis R. Rodriguez writes ("Wiki for automatic reports / fixes"): [...] > While discussing expectations and information about > reports over these with Valentin it occurred to me information about > all these may be scattered separately and some developers may be > surprised when they first get reports / fixes from these sorts of > testing systems and that perhaps it may be useful if we had a single > wiki entry point where we could refer folks to the different ongoing > testing infrastructures out there working upstream. > > If we could piggy back off of an already existing wiki then great, but > if not I was thinking something off of wiki.kernel.org might be good. > How about tests.wiki.kernel.org ? If such projects don't have a wiki > they could perhaps use pages off of tests.wiki.kernel.org to elaborate > and set expectations straight. Thoughts? To clarify what I think you are suggesting, is to create a new wiki or wiki page which gives information about automatic tests that are performed on upstream (or going-upstream) Linux branches ? I think this is a good idea. I'm not sure how much information we need for each tester, but a page for each would be about right. Ian.