From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] C6X: devicetree
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:11:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2208047.tv5XC4ZmAf@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6tVafwVN6vdU7sCxL5JM7+as0bp_AaHaGAyE9+eTgR5Tw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 13 September 2011 11:54:36 Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > I guess it still depends, it's probably a grey area. If the register layout
> > is the same on all c6x cores and it's only for core stuff, there is no need
> > to put it in the device tree. If you have multiple soc (off-core) devices
> > being controlled through the registers, or the numbers vary a lot between
> > different chips, I would put all of them into the device tree.
>
> It's an interrupt controller. There still needs to be a node to act
> as the interrupt-parent and specify #interrupt-cells.
I was talking about whether the interrupt controller node needs to have
a "regs" property or not. If the register space is similar to generic
MMIO registers, it should have one, like all other users of these
registers. If it's more like ARM's coprocessor extension, it probably
should not.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 21:26 [PATCH v2 00/24] C6X: New architecture patch set Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 01/24] fix default __strnlen_user macro Mark Salter
2011-08-31 23:30 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-09-01 1:38 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-01 1:54 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-09-01 19:23 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-01 23:34 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 02/24] fixed generic page.h for non-zero PAGE_OFFSET Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 03/24] add ELF machine define for TI C6X DSPs Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 04/24] C6X: build infrastructure Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 05/24] C6X: early boot code Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 06/24] C6X: devicetree Mark Salter
2011-09-12 20:11 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-12 23:20 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-13 6:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-13 12:39 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-13 15:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-13 17:54 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-13 20:11 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-09-13 22:26 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 07/24] C6X: memory management and DMA support Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/24] C6X: process management Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 09/24] C6X: signal management Mark Salter
2011-09-01 9:50 ` Matt Fleming
2011-09-01 19:15 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management Mark Salter
2011-09-09 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 14:12 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-13 1:16 ` john stultz
2011-09-13 3:18 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-13 3:44 ` john stultz
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 11/24] C6X: interrupt handling Mark Salter
2011-09-09 14:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 14:27 ` Mark Salter
2011-09-12 14:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 20:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 12/24] C6X: syscalls Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 13/24] C6X: traps Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 14/24] C6X: clocks Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 15/24] C6X: cache control Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 16/24] C6X: loadable module support Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 17/24] C6X: ptrace support Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 18/24] C6X: headers Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 19/24] C6X: library code Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 20/24] C6X: general SoC support Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 21/24] C6X: specific " Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 22/24] C6X: EMIF - External Memory Interface Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 23/24] C6X: Power and Sleep Controller Mark Salter
2011-08-31 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] C6X: New architecture patch set Mark Salter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2208047.tv5XC4ZmAf@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®