From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755833Ab3A2LpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:45:18 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:58459 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751732Ab3A2LpO (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:45:14 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: inderpal.singh@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Set policy->related_cpus to atleast policy->cpus Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:51:23 +0100 Message-ID: <2215618.GPIWS1OcnB@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc5; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:09:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > With the addition of following patch, related_cpus is required to be set by > cpufreq platform drivers: > > commit c1070fd743533efb54e98142252283583f379190 > Author: Viresh Kumar > Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:04 2013 +0000 > > cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() > I've dropped this one in the meantime. Can you please fold the $subject patch into "cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()" and post the result instead? That surely will be less confusing? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.