From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jreuter@yaina.de, ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, thomas@osterried.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ax25: Fix deadlock caused by skb_recv_datagram in ax25_recvmsg
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:41:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22175690a4e89a78abcb8244dfd0bdd0005267a5.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220608012923.17505-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn>
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 09:29 +0800, Duoming Zhou wrote:
> The skb_recv_datagram() in ax25_recvmsg() will hold lock_sock
> and block until it receives a packet from the remote. If the client
> doesn`t connect to server and calls read() directly, it will not
> receive any packets forever. As a result, the deadlock will happen.
>
> The fail log caused by deadlock is shown below:
>
> [ 369.606973] INFO: task ax25_deadlock:157 blocked for more than 245 seconds.
> [ 369.608919] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [ 369.613058] Call Trace:
> [ 369.613315] <TASK>
> [ 369.614072] __schedule+0x2f9/0xb20
> [ 369.615029] schedule+0x49/0xb0
> [ 369.615734] __lock_sock+0x92/0x100
> [ 369.616763] ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x20/0x20
> [ 369.617941] lock_sock_nested+0x6e/0x70
> [ 369.618809] ax25_bind+0xaa/0x210
> [ 369.619736] __sys_bind+0xca/0xf0
> [ 369.620039] ? do_futex+0xae/0x1b0
> [ 369.620387] ? __x64_sys_futex+0x7c/0x1c0
> [ 369.620601] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x19/0x40
> [ 369.620613] __x64_sys_bind+0x11/0x20
> [ 369.621791] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> [ 369.622423] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> [ 369.623319] RIP: 0033:0x7f43c8aa8af7
> [ 369.624301] RSP: 002b:00007f43c8197ef8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
> [ 369.625756] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f43c8aa8af7
> [ 369.626724] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055768e2021d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
> [ 369.628569] RBP: 00007f43c8197f00 R08: 0000000000000011 R09: 00007f43c8198700
> [ 369.630208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff845e6afe
> [ 369.632240] R13: 00007fff845e6aff R14: 00007f43c8197fc0 R15: 00007f43c8198700
>
> This patch moves the skb_recv_datagram() before lock_sock() in order that
> other functions that need lock_sock could be executed. What`s more, we
> add skb_free_datagram() before goto out in order to mitigate memory leak.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
> Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
> Reported-by: Thomas Habets <thomas@@habets.se>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Add skb_free_datagram() before goto out in order to mitigate memory leak.
>
> net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
> index 95393bb2760..62aa5993093 100644
> --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
> +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
> @@ -1665,6 +1665,11 @@ static int ax25_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
> int copied;
> int err = 0;
>
> + /* Now we can treat all alike */
> + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err);
> + if (!skb)
> + goto done;
> +
Note that this causes a behavior change: before this patch, calling
recvmsg() on unconnected seqpacket sockets returned immediatelly with
an error (due to the the check below), now it blocks.
The change may confuse (== break) user-space applications. I think it
would be better replacing skb_recv_datagram with an open-coded variant
of it releasing the socket lock before the
__skb_wait_for_more_packets() call and re-acquiring it after such call.
Somewhat alike __unix_dgram_recvmsg().
In any case this lacks a 'Fixes' pointing to the commit introducing the
issue addressed here.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-08 1:29 Duoming Zhou
2022-06-09 8:41 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-06-09 13:17 ` duoming
2022-06-09 13:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-06-09 16:10 ` duoming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22175690a4e89a78abcb8244dfd0bdd0005267a5.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jreuter@yaina.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=thomas@osterried.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®