From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo <jorgefm@cirsa.com>,
Sachin Mokashi <sachinx.mokashi@intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: remove status, it is shadowing status of a higher scope
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:04:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2232d5d3-2a14-aa13-b41c-ae90fe530357@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160909090929.27845-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 9/9/16 2:09 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The second declaration of status is shadowing the status of a higher
> scope. This uninitialized status results in garbage being returned
> by the !x86_match_cpu(cpu_ids) || !iosf_mbi_available() return exit
> path. Fix this by removing the extraneous second declaration of
> status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Gah... thanks for correcting this, not sure how I missed it, was there a
compiler warning?
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> index 773acfb..4c14215 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ static int is_byt_cr(struct device *dev, bool *bytcr)
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 55 }, /* Valleyview, Bay Trail */
> {}
> };
> - int status;
> u32 bios_status;
>
> if (!x86_match_cpu(cpu_ids) || !iosf_mbi_available()) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-09 9:09 Colin King
2016-09-09 17:04 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2016-09-09 17:09 ` [alsa-devel] " Colin Ian King
2016-09-25 5:57 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: remove status, it is shadowing status of a higher scope" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2232d5d3-2a14-aa13-b41c-ae90fe530357@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=jorgefm@cirsa.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=sachinx.mokashi@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®