From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934708Ab2JXLNO (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:13:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11410 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932128Ab2JXLNM (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:13:12 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20121024103559.GB10691@gmail.com> References: <20121024103559.GB10691@gmail.com> <20121022120558.14413.78980.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Ingo Molnar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:12:53 +0100 Message-ID: <22333.1351077173@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > Just wondering, have the tools/perf/ issues been solved in your > tree, are the x86 UAPI disintegration changes pullable? Did you have a look at the set of five patches I sent? I think those should fix up perf and building tools with O=, but I'm not sure whether we want the last two. From commits already made, I'm guessing that at least patch #4 should be made. Note that the disintegrate-x86 branch does not include any perf fixes. I can regenerate that with some or all of them, once I know what they will be. David