From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI / EC: Fix issues related to the event handling.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:19:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2236613.EKZhFJ1YD4@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1433999639.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 01:21:14 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> ACPI specification doesn't define the SCI_EVT clearing timing for the EC
> firmware. There could be 4 possible positions the firmware may use to clear
> the SCI_EVT indication:
> STATUS: After indicating SCI_EVT to the host via the status register
> (EC_SC), the target can clear SCI_EVT at any time.
> QUERY: After seeing the query request (QR_EC) written to the command
> register (EC_CMD) by the host and having prepared the responding
> event value in the data register (EC_DATA), the target can safely
> clear SCI_EVT.
> EVENT: After seeing the event response read from the data register
> (EC_DATA) by the host, the target can clear SCI_EVT.
> METHOD: After the event has been handled via the host _Qxx evaluation,
> the target can clear SCI_EVT.
>
> The old EC driver re-checked SCI_EVT using the 3rd position, while during
> the race fixes, the new EC driver was switched to re-check SCI_EVT using
> the 1st position. Using the earliest position may help to reduce issues
> when the other races are not fully fixed and there is an ACPI specification
> statement around an expected behavior:
> The query value of zero is reserved for a spurious query result and
> indicates "no outstanding events."
> This statement was the motivation of this choice.
>
> But there are platforms do not follow this definition, since there is also
> a coverity issue left in the new EC driver, the unmatched SCI_EVT clearing
> timing finally was trapped by this coverity issue, and users can see that
> the new EC driver stops processing further SCI_EVTs. The new EC driver then
> implemented EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE quirk as a workaround for such
> platforms.
> Now more and more reports can be seen for this SCI_EVT clearing timing
> unmatched problem, we need to consider a better approach to fix all of them
> instead of adding new EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE quirk users.
>
> This patchset thus finally implements 3 of 4 modes to handle the SCI_EVT
> clearing timing variations (1 was proven by 94411 not compliant to the
> Windows behavior). And according to the tests, chooses the next earlier
> position (the 2rd position) as the default behavior.
>
> This patchset also fixes the coverity problem so that even though the
> default behavior still cannot match the Windows behavior, it is possible
> for the new EC driver to proceed to handle further SCI_EVT indications.
>
> Related bug reports are as follows:
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82611
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94411
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97381
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98111
>
> Lv Zheng (5):
> ACPI / EC: Cleanup transaction state transition.
> ACPI / EC: Convert event handling work queue into loop style.
> ACPI / EC: Add event clearing variation support.
> ACPI / EC: Fix EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE platforms using new event
> clearing timing.
> ACPI / EC: Fix a code coverity issue when QR_EC transactions are
> failed.
>
> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Queued up for 4.2, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 5:26 [PATCH 0/6] " Lv Zheng
2015-06-08 5:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI / EC: Cleanup transaction state transition Lv Zheng
2015-06-08 5:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI / EC: Cleanup _Qxx evaluation work item Lv Zheng
2015-06-09 14:41 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-06-08 5:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI / EC: Convert event handling work queue into loop style Lv Zheng
2015-06-08 5:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI / EC: Add event clearing variation support Lv Zheng
2015-06-08 5:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] ACPI / EC: Fix EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE platforms using new event clearing timing Lv Zheng
2015-06-08 5:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] ACPI / EC: Fix a code coverity issue when QR_EC transactions are failed Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI / EC: Fix issues related to the event handling Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI / EC: Cleanup transaction state transition Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI / EC: Convert event handling work queue into loop style Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / EC: Add event clearing variation support Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI / EC: Fix EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE platforms using new event clearing timing Lv Zheng
2015-06-11 5:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / EC: Fix a code coverity issue when QR_EC transactions are failed Lv Zheng
2015-06-15 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2236613.EKZhFJ1YD4@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=zetalog@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®