From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Armin Wolf <w_armin@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] ACPI: EC: Avoid evaluating _REG for non-functional operation regions
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22385894.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
Hi Everyone,
The purpose of this series is to address issues reported here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1f76b7e2-1928-4598-8037-28a1785c2d13@redhat.com/
and related to evaluating _REG for EC operation regions that are not
expected to be used (for example, because they reside in the scopes of
ACPI device objects whose _STA returns 0).
The first patch reverts commit 0e6b6dedf168 ("Revert "ACPI: EC: Evaluate orphan
_REG under EC device") that will not be necessary after making the changes in
the last patch. The second patch modifies acpi_execute_reg_methods() to take
an additional "depth" argument that will be needed doing forward.
The last patch moves the _REG evaluation for EC operation regions beyond the
EC device scope to acpi_bus_attach() so it is only evaluated if the device
object holding the EC operation region is present.
Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 13:06 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2024-08-12 13:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] Revert "ACPI: EC: Evaluate orphan _REG under EC device" Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-12 13:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] ACPICA: Add a depth argument to acpi_execute_reg_methods() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-12 13:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI: EC: Evaluate _REG outside the EC scope more carefully Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22385894.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=w_armin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®