From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F066BC7618E for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240550AbjDZNyS (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:54:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44632 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240952AbjDZNyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:54:15 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7013F6E92; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 06:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33QDrt5r104345; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:53:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1682517235; bh=W+58kcFlpy4zgiGRyo/D7WwXuTR569I4K9Q6sc5aV3E=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=XUugwJa7nkquxPKr0eoptX+pmb+SukwwgupUIGVSSZh8/i0h1cq++G4BpMcQLk8eu 4WDQYzu3Wocqtra1zxDKkBZCdlmTamETVc0zV+ms/wMlbVhFzCiB6+/anzVPn75uN3 v/YV5xjFk0qdQRBXoP+9Zuw+rNPYzyJEH3/nBiFU= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 33QDrt5t042588 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:53:55 -0500 Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.16; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:53:55 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:53:55 -0500 Received: from [10.249.133.231] (ileaxei01-snat2.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.6]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33QDrlDf037318; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:53:48 -0500 Message-ID: <223be03f-78dc-9be8-8a90-66cdd5a368ba@ti.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:23:46 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts/ti: am65x: Add Rocktech OLDI panel DT overlay Content-Language: en-US To: Nishanth Menon CC: Vignesh Raghavendra , Andrew Davis , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Devicetree List , Linux Kernel List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Jyri Sarha , Tomi Valkeinen , Praneeth Bajjuri , Rahul T R , Devarsh Thakkar , Jai Luthra , Jayesh Choudhary References: <20230426060612.19271-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com> <20230426060612.19271-2-a-bhatia1@ti.com> <20230426125334.flj6ndo6s7esmcho@scotch> From: Aradhya Bhatia In-Reply-To: <20230426125334.flj6ndo6s7esmcho@scotch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26-Apr-23 18:23, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 11:36-20230426, Aradhya Bhatia wrote: > [...] >> # Boards with J7200 SoC >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dtb >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board-rocktech-rk101-panel.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board-rocktech-rk101-panel.dtso >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..aed6dcf3bd7d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board-rocktech-rk101-panel.dtso >> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/** >> + * OLDI-LCD1EVM Rocktech integrated panel and touch DT overlay for AM654-EVM. > > product link please. > Added the link in the commit message because believing that is the status quo. Remember referencing this patch[1] a while back. But a deeper look now tells me that, that might not be the case. Or perhaps, its different for dt-binding patches and devictree patches. Will correct this in v3 and send again. Regards Aradhya [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/357122/