From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Krystian Garbaciak <krystian.garbaciak@diasemi.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: regmap: Modeling a shared page selection register
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:22:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2241758.yiUUSuA9gR@n9w6sw14> (raw)
Hi,
I try to develop a driver for the JLSemi JL5104 Ethernet switch (no public
documentation available, sorry). The device is attached via the MDIO bus
and offers different register accesses (it occupies 8 PHY addresses):
1. Direct access (on each PHY address for the first 16 registers)
2. Paged access (only on PHY address 0, last 16 registers are paged,
register 31 is used for page selection)
There are also 'indirectly' accessed registers, but that is not part of
this question.
I would like to build regmap for this like the following:
---------------------------------------8<---------------------------------------------------
/* Regmap addresses are built from the phy address, the page number and the register address */
#define JL51XX_PHY_PHY_MASK GENMASK(25, 21) /* PHY address, 5 bit */
#define JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_MASK GENMASK(20, 5) /* Page address within PHY, 16 bit */
#define JL51XX_PHY_REG_MASK GENMASK( 4, 0) /* Register within page, 5 bit */
#define JL51XX_PHY0_BASE 0x00000000U
#define JL51XX_PHY_BLOCK_SIZE 0x00200000U
#define JL51XX_PHY_BASE(PHY) (JL51XX_PHY0_BASE + (PHY) * JL51XX_PHY_BLOCK_SIZE)
#define JL51XX_PHY_END(PHY) (JL51XX_PHY_BASE(PHY) + JL51XX_PHY_BLOCK_SIZE - 1)
/* Page selection register, shared between all PHYs !!! */
#define JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_SEL 31
#define JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(PHY) \
{ \
.name = "JL51xx PHY" __stringify(PHY) " paged registers", \
.range_min = JL51XX_PHY_BASE(PHY), \
.range_max = JL51XX_PHY_END(PHY), \
/*.selector_reg = JL51XX_PHY_BASE(PHY) + JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_SEL, */ \
.selector_reg = JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_SEL, \
.selector_mask = GENMASK(15, 0), \
.selector_shift = 0, \
.window_start = JL51XX_PHY_BASE(PHY), \
.window_len = 32, \
}
static const struct regmap_range_cfg jl51xx_paged_regmap_ranges[] = {
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(0),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(1),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(2),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(3),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(4),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(5),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(6),
JL51XX_PAGED_REGMAP_RANGE(7),
};
static const struct regmap_config jl51xx_paged_regmap_config = {
.name = "JL51xx direct accessible (paged) registers",
.reg_bits = 32, // roundup(phy[5] + page[8] + reg[5], 8)
.reg_stride = 1,
.val_bits = 16,
.readable_reg = jl51xx_paged_regmap_readable_reg,
.volatile_reg = jl51xx_paged_regmap_volatile_reg,
.lock = jl51xx_regmap_lock,
.unlock = jl51xx_regmap_unlock,
.max_register = JL51XX_PHY0_BASE
+ JL51XX_NUM_PHYS * JL51XX_PHY_BLOCK_SIZE - 1,
.cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE,
.ranges = jl51xx_paged_regmap_ranges,
.num_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(jl51xx_paged_regmap_ranges),
};
...
jl51xx->regmap_paged = devm_regmap_init(dev,
&jl51xx_regmap_mdio_c22_bus,
jl51xx, &jl51xx_paged_regmap_config);
--------------------------------------->8---------------------------------------------------
The problem is, that devm_regmap_init() prints the following error:
> jl51xx 2188000.ethernet-1:00: Range 0: selector for 1 in window
So, regmap complains because the selector_reg (JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_SEL) of one
range appears within the range_min..rage_max area of another/all ranges
(PHYs in my case). But this is how the hardware actually works.
Of course, I could access the JL51XX_PHY_PAGE_SEL also via unique aliases
which lay inside the individual ranges (see the line which is commented out).
But this would break caching (as all aliases of the PAGE_SEL register share
the same resource in hardware). Caching this particular register is the
most significant speedup I can imagine for this device, as it has to be
accessed for almost every other register access.
On the other hand, the PAGE_SEL register is not meaningful for the first
16 registers of each PHY. So, coding individual cached page selection logic
(within the driver, without using regmap ranges at all) could avoid
writing the PAGE_SEL register when accessing registers which are
not dependent on the page selection logic.
I have also tried to model this using only a single regmap_range (for
all PHYs). But then, the 'PHY address' part of the regmap_adress gets
lost within regmap's page selection logic (the PHY address becomes
part of the page address, until it is by the masked out by the
'selector_mask').
After commenting out the "selector / range" checking logic in __regmap_init(),
everything seems to work fine:
#if 0
if (range_cfg->range_min <= sel_reg &&
sel_reg <= range_cfg->range_max) {
dev_err(map->dev,
"Range %d: selector for %d in window\n",
i, j);
goto err_range;
}
#endif
This check dates back since 2012, so it feels wrong to me to simply remove it:
6863ca622759 ("regmap: Add support for register indirect addressing.")
So should I better open coding the page selection stuff into my driver?
regards,
Christian
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-25 16:22 Christian Eggers [this message]
2025-10-27 8:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-27 9:38 ` Christian Eggers
2025-10-27 13:15 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-27 14:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2241758.yiUUSuA9gR@n9w6sw14 \
--to=ceggers@arri.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=krystian.garbaciak@diasemi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®