mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2]  cpufreq: powernv: Ramp-down global pstate slower than local-pstate
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 23:17:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2253617.134ktIcBZI@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461059881-14434-1-git-send-email-akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 03:27:59 PM Akshay Adiga wrote:
> The frequency transition latency from pmin to pmax is observed to be in few
> millisecond granurality. And it usually happens to take a performance penalty
> during sudden frequency rampup requests.
> 
> This patch set solves this problem by using a chip-level entity called "global
> pstates". Global pstate manages elements across other dependent core chiplets.
> Typically, the element that needs to be managed is the voltage setting.
> So by holding global pstates higher than local pstate for some amount of time
> ( ~5 seconds) the subsequent rampups could be made faster.
> 
> (1/2) patch removes the flag from cpufreq_policy->driver_data, so that it can
> be used for tracking global pstates.
> 
> (2/2) patch adds code for global pstate management.
> - The iozone results with this patchset, shows improvements in almost all cases.
> - YCSB workload on redis with various  target operations per second shows 
> better MaxLatency with this patch.
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - Fixed coding style
> - Added a routine to reset global_pstate_info instead of hacky memset
> - Handled case where cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() fails
> - changed int queue_gpstate_timer() to void queue_gpstate_timer()
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - dropped the unreated change. 
> 
> Akshay Adiga (1):
>   cpufreq: powernv: Ramp-down global pstate slower than local-pstate
> 
> Shilpasri G Bhat (1):
>   cpufreq: powernv: Remove flag use-case of policy->driver_data
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 256 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Both [1-2/2] applied, thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19  9:57 Akshay Adiga
2016-04-19  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: powernv: Remove flag use-case of policy->driver_data Akshay Adiga
2016-04-19  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: powernv: Ramp-down global pstate slower than local-pstate Akshay Adiga
2016-05-04 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2253617.134ktIcBZI@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®