From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Jörg Otte" <jrg.otte@gmail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>,
len.brown@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Avoid getting stuck in high P-states when idle
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:09:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2256431.6LpmRCrGe6@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Jörg Otte reports that commit a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate:
Replace timers with utilization update callbacks) caused the CPUs in
his Haswell-based system to stay in the very high frequency region
even if the system is completely idle.
That turns out to be an existing problem in the intel_pstate driver's
P-state selection algorithm for Core processors. Namely, all
decisions made by that algorithm are based on the average frequency
of the CPU between sampling events and on the P-state requested on
the last invocation, so it may get stuck at a very hight frequency
even if the utilization of the CPU is very low (in fact, it may get
stuck in a inadequate P-state regardless of the CPU utilization).
The only way to kick it out of that limbo is a sufficiently long idle
period (3 times longer than the prescribed sampling interval), but if
that doesn't happen often enough (eg. due to a timing change like
after the above commit), the P-state of the CPU may be inadequate
pretty much all the time.
To address the most egregious manifestations of that issue, reset the
core_busy value used to determine the next P-state to request if the
utilization of the CPU, determined with the help of the MPERF
feedback register and the TSC, is below 1%.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115771
Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -995,6 +995,10 @@ static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_
sample_ratio = div_fp(int_tofp(pid_params.sample_rate_ns),
int_tofp(duration_ns));
core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, sample_ratio);
+ } else {
+ sample_ratio = div_fp(100 * cpu->sample.mperf, cpu->sample.tsc);
+ if (sample_ratio < int_tofp(1))
+ core_busy = 0;
}
cpu->sample.busy_scaled = core_busy;
reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2256431.6LpmRCrGe6@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=jrg.otte@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®