From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754389AbbANJGD (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:06:03 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:50399 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752574AbbANJF7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:05:59 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Olof Johansson , Nicolas Ferre , ARM Maintainers , Boris BREZILLON , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:05:08 +0100 Message-ID: <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> References: <20150112224203.GL22090@quad.lixom.net> <20150113230956.GA15087@quad.lixom.net> <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gacbGRI68Fi/IZkOkGItewO9Nlre78EjFh70AYiUhtYbZQ0l4Po 2w6z6BeKA+o7zK1rSkaI9omoFyHEM11fAVqLinXbOg6NuSBLwZkfxWnCouM7SGO30P0yaAP ophHYaWjBptKuV4hy1Ws9GpG7Qo7YI0MOPJs3m8gRI+Ecs0xABDufHUioaFjJQQMAKXtdoe VALNF0dAZDF6V+1oZaJpg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote : > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config > > > options may be removed in the near future. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > > > --- > > > Hi Olof, > > > > > > This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format. > > > If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I > > > don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in > > > arm-soc and can be used by everyone. > > > > Hi, > > > > If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how > > things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig > > entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information > > w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either. > > > > You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other > series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the > only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both > under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7. > > That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option > per SoC. With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig options. Arnd