From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263812AbTLOPzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:55:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263811AbTLOPzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:55:50 -0500 Received: from citrine.spiritone.com ([216.99.193.133]:30955 "EHLO citrine.spiritone.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263809AbTLOPzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:55:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:55:42 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Larry McVoy cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com Subject: Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper Message-ID: <2269690000.1071503741@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20031215154226.GD16554@work.bitmover.com> References: <20031214172156.GA16554@work.bitmover.com> <2259130000.1071469863@[10.10.2.4]> <20031215154226.GD16554@work.bitmover.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Larry McVoy wrote (on Monday, December 15, 2003 07:42:26 -0800): > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:31:04PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> One thing that I've wished for in the past which looks like it *might* >> be trivial to do is to grab a raw version of the patch you already >> put out in HTML format, eg if I surf down changesets and get to a page >> like this: >> >> http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/patch@1.1522?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2w|cset@1.1522 > > We can do that and we will, it's just not hit the top of the priority list. > Given past discussions on this list I had thought there was a strong need > for a way to trivially track any BK tree without BK, maybe I misunderstood > what was being asked. I suspect different people have different needs ;-) > There isn't any reason we can't do both. Thanks! M.