From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, surenb@google.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
mhocko@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/mm: add a test for UFFDIO_MOVE of a write-protected swap entry
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:41:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <226ec797-ff8c-4465-a682-21c684a25021@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925042907.2330519-3-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
On 9/25/26 06:29, Donggeun Yoo wrote:
> Move a swapped-out page out of a write-protected area into a destination
> registered for missing faults only, and read pagemap bit 57 at the
> destination. The destination was never write-protected, so the bit must
> be clear.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index ef9b3956bdcfd..ae8b718f0a278 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -2037,6 +2037,59 @@ static void uffd_move_pmd_split_test(uffd_global_test_opts_t *gopts, uffd_test_a
> uffd_move_pmd_handle_fault);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Moving a swapped-out page out of a write-protected area must not carry the
> + * uffd-wp bit into a destination that is not write-protect registered: such a
> + * bit is never cleared afterwards, so pagemap keeps reporting the page as
> + * uffd-tracked.
> + *
> + * Needs a swap device; skipped if MADV_PAGEOUT cannot evict the page.
> + */
> +static void uffd_move_swap_wp_test(uffd_global_test_opts_t *gopts,
> + uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> +{
> + unsigned long page_size = gopts->page_size;
> + struct uffdio_move move = { };
> + int pagemap_fd, i;
> +
> + if (uffd_register(gopts->uffd, gopts->area_src, page_size,
> + false, true, false))
> + err("register src failure");
> + if (uffd_register(gopts->uffd, gopts->area_dst, page_size,
> + true, false, false))
Side note: this binary encoding of features is horrible.
> + err("register dst failure");
> +
> + wp_range(gopts->uffd, (unsigned long)gopts->area_src, page_size, true);
> +
> + pagemap_fd = pagemap_open();
> + for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> + if (madvise(gopts->area_src, page_size, MADV_PAGEOUT))
> + err("MADV_PAGEOUT");
> + if (pagemap_is_swapped(pagemap_fd, gopts->area_src))
> + break;
> + usleep(10000);
> + }
Is this loop really required? I thought the page should just be unmapped from
the page table. It might still be in the swapcache and under writeback, but
that's irrelevant.
> + if (!pagemap_is_swapped(pagemap_fd, gopts->area_src)) {
> + uffd_test_skip("MADV_PAGEOUT did not swap the page; is swap enabled?");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + move.dst = (unsigned long)gopts->area_dst;
> + move.src = (unsigned long)gopts->area_src;
> + move.len = page_size;
> + if (ioctl(gopts->uffd, UFFDIO_MOVE, &move))
> + err("UFFDIO_MOVE");
> +
> + if (pagemap_get_entry(pagemap_fd, gopts->area_dst) & PM_UFFD_WP)
> + uffd_test_fail("uffd-wp bit moved into an area that is not write-protected");
> + else
> + uffd_test_pass();
> +out:
> + close(pagemap_fd);
> + uffd_unregister(gopts->uffd, gopts->area_src, page_size);
> + uffd_unregister(gopts->uffd, gopts->area_dst, page_size);
> +}
> +
> static bool
> uffdio_verify_results(const char *name, int ret, int error, long result)
> {
> @@ -2359,6 +2412,14 @@ uffd_test_case_t uffd_tests[] = {
> .uffd_feature_required = UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE,
> .test_case_ops = &uffd_move_test_pmd_case_ops,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "move-swap-wp",
> + .uffd_fn = uffd_move_swap_wp_test,
> + .mem_targets = MEM_ANON,
> + .uffd_feature_required = UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE |
> + UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP,
> + .test_case_ops = &uffd_move_test_case_ops,
> + },
Do we also want to check wrp? I'd assume it suffers from the same problem (did
not check carefully though)
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 4:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] userfaultfd: clear the inherited uffd bit in move_swap_pte() Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-25 4:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-25 4:48 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-25 7:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-25 4:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/mm: add a test for UFFDIO_MOVE of a write-protected swap entry Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-25 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=226ec797-ff8c-4465-a682-21c684a25021@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®