mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() to initialize AMX state
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 11:50:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <228b8157-9148-4175-b5b7-0e0f8da6bad6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <758089a4-52d5-4649-8aee-89e60044918a@intel.com>

On 5/9/24 11:41, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 5/9/2024 10:36 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>> I'd probably just do this:
>>
>> +    kernel_fpu_begin();
>> +    // AMX *MUST* be in the init state for the wrmsr() to work.
>> +    // But, the more in the init state, the less state the test
>> +    // has to save and restore.  Just zap everything.
>> +    restore_fpregs_from_fpstate(&init_fpstate,   
>> +                    fpu_user_cfg.max_features);
>> +
> 
> I assume that this snippet goes to the IFS driver side. Then, we need
> to introduce and export a new wrapper for this. 
> restore_fpregs_from_fpstate() and its arguments are not accessible as
> of now.

Yes, a new wrapper to initialize all the user FPU state is fine.

> Also, I think we should encapsulate them. If we follow this style, we
> could have invoked tilerelease() directly from the idle driver, right?

You could have...  But I think the point there truly was to do a minimal
amount of work because you're going idle and need to race to get there.
The path to idle is super hot and you don't want to do _any_ additional
work.  It's worth writing highly AMX-specific code because generic code
would be slow there.

The IFS path is a super duper slow one.  It takes *FOREVER*.  I like the
idea of being simple, dumb and slow.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-09 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-30 21:25 [PATCH 0/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() for the In-Field Scan driver Chang S. Bae
2024-04-30 21:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() to initialize AMX state Chang S. Bae
2024-04-30 23:42   ` Ashok Raj
2024-04-30 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Initialize AMX state for the scan test Chang S. Bae
2024-05-01  0:06   ` Ashok Raj
2024-05-01  8:58   ` Hans de Goede
2024-05-08  0:22     ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-02 11:00   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-02 22:19     ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-09  0:45   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-05-02 20:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() for the In-Field Scan driver Chang S. Bae
2024-05-02 21:35   ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-02 20:59 ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-07 23:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Chang S. Bae
2024-05-07 23:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() to initialize AMX state Chang S. Bae
2024-05-08 13:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-08 14:40     ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-08 18:03       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-08 19:11         ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-09  0:29       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-09 17:36         ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-09 17:41           ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-09 18:41           ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-09 18:50             ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-05-10  7:51           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-07 23:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Initialize AMX state for the scan test Chang S. Bae
2024-05-08  0:19     ` Ashok Raj
2024-05-08  0:21       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-05-08  8:28   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/fpu: Extend kernel_fpu_begin_mask() for the In-Field Scan driver Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=228b8157-9148-4175-b5b7-0e0f8da6bad6@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®