mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Cleanup native_patch()
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:54:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <229941d4-c152-89fb-eb75-fcfa5f265ad4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180908152800.GA8286@zn.tnic>

On 08/09/18 17:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> When CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS=n, it fires
> 
>   arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c: In function ‘native_patch’:
>   arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c:89:1: warning: label ‘patch_site’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
>    patch_site:
> 
> but those labels can simply be removed by directly calling the
> respective functions there.
> 
> Get rid of local variables too, while at it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> ---
> 
> It looks even more cleaner now. :)

And there is still some more clean up possible:

> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c | 48 +++++++++++-----------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c | 49 ++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c
> index d460cbcabcfe..0865323c2716 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c
> @@ -34,14 +34,10 @@ extern bool pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted(void);
>  
>  unsigned native_patch(u8 type, void *ibuf, unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
>  {
> -	const unsigned char *start, *end;
> -	unsigned ret;
> -
>  #define PATCH_SITE(ops, x)					\
> -		case PARAVIRT_PATCH(ops.x):			\
> -			start = start_##ops##_##x;		\
> -			end = end_##ops##_##x;			\
> -			goto patch_site
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(ops.x):				\
> +		return paravirt_patch_insns(ibuf, len, start_##ops##_##x, end_##ops##_##x)
> +
>  	switch (type) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
>  		PATCH_SITE(irq, irq_disable);
> @@ -54,32 +50,26 @@ unsigned native_patch(u8 type, void *ibuf, unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
>  		PATCH_SITE(mmu, write_cr3);
>  #endif
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
> -		case PARAVIRT_PATCH(lock.queued_spin_unlock):
> -			if (pv_is_native_spin_unlock()) {
> -				start = start_lock_queued_spin_unlock;
> -				end   = end_lock_queued_spin_unlock;
> -				goto patch_site;
> -			}
> -			goto patch_default;
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(lock.queued_spin_unlock):
> +		if (pv_is_native_spin_unlock())
> +			return paravirt_patch_insns(ibuf, len,
> +						    start_lock_queued_spin_unlock,
> +						    end_lock_queued_spin_unlock);
> +		else
> +			return paravirt_patch_default(type, ibuf, addr, len);

Why not replace the else clause by a "break;" and ...

>  
> -		case PARAVIRT_PATCH(lock.vcpu_is_preempted):
> -			if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted()) {
> -				start = start_lock_vcpu_is_preempted;
> -				end   = end_lock_vcpu_is_preempted;
> -				goto patch_site;
> -			}
> -			goto patch_default;
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(lock.vcpu_is_preempted):
> +		if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted())
> +			return paravirt_patch_insns(ibuf, len,
> +						    start_lock_vcpu_is_preempted,
> +						    end_lock_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +		else
> +			return paravirt_patch_default(type, ibuf, addr, len);

... this as well and ...

>  #endif
>  
>  	default:
> -patch_default: __maybe_unused
> -		ret = paravirt_patch_default(type, ibuf, addr, len);
> -		break;
> -
> -patch_site:
> -		ret = paravirt_patch_insns(ibuf, len, start, end);
> -		break;
> +		return paravirt_patch_default(type, ibuf, addr, len);

... remove this return and ...

>  	}
>  #undef PATCH_SITE
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;

Replace this by
	return paravirt_patch_default(type, ibuf, addr, len);


Same for paravirt_patch_64.c, of course.


Juergen

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 10:49 [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Get rid of patch_site label Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 20:10   ` [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Get rid of patch_site and patch_default labels Borislav Petkov
2018-09-08  5:45     ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-08 15:28       ` [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Cleanup native_patch() Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10  6:54         ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2018-09-10  7:01           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10  8:33             ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-11  9:15               ` [PATCH v2] " Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11  9:44                 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-11 15:34                 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] x86/paravirt: Clean up native_patch() tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=229941d4-c152-89fb-eb75-fcfa5f265ad4@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®