From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, anup@brainfault.org, heiko@sntech.de,
guoren@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr,
alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com, bhe@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, crash-utility@redhat.com,
heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com, k-hagio-ab@nec.com,
hschauhan@nulltrace.org, yixun.lan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] RISC-V fixups to work with crash tool
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 06:24:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55606b89-13f2-5e3b-9176-bacbec8c36d1@linux.alibaba.com>
On 13 October 2022 03:28:09 IST, Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>在 2022/10/12 下午5:52, Conor Dooley 写道:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:42:37PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
>>> 在 2022/8/12 上午12:17, Palmer Dabbelt 写道:
>>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:41:44 PDT (-0700),
>>>> xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com wrote:
>>>>> I ever sent the patch 1 in the link:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220708073150.352830-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> And patch 2,3 in the link:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch set just put these patches together, and with three new
>>>>> patch 4, 5, 6.
>>>>> these six patches are the fixups for machine_kexec, kernel mode PC
>>>>> for vmcore
>>>>> and improvements for vmcoreinfo, memory layout dump and fixup
>>>>> schedule out issue
>>>>> in machine_crash_shutdown().
>>>>>
>>>>> The main changes in the six patchs as below,
>>>>> Patch 1: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context, to
>>>>> cleanup
>>>>> the console prints.
>>>>> Patch 2: Fixup to get correct kernel mode PC for kernel mode regs
>>>>> for vmcore.
>>>>> Patch 3: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
>>>>> Patch 4: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump.
>>>>> Patch 5: Add VM layout, va bits, ram base to vmcoreinfo, which can
>>>>> simplify
>>>>> the development of crash tool as ARM64 already did
>>>>> (arch/arm64/kernel/crash_core.c).
>>>>> Patch 6: Updates vmcoreinfo.rst for vmcoreinfo export for RISCV64.
>>>>>
>>>>> With these six patches(patch 2 is must), crash tool can work well to
>>>>> analyze
>>>>> a vmcore. The patches for crash tool for RISCV64 is in the link:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220801043040.2003264-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>>>> 1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from
>>>>> this series
>>>>> of patches, as it already applied to riscv git.
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98
>>>>> 2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1.
>>>>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>>>>> use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in patch 5 subject line.
>>>>> Changes v3 -> v4:
>>>>> use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in the summary of patch 5 subject
>>>>> line.
>>>>> Changes v4 -> v5:
>>>>> add a new patch "RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in
>>>>> machine_crash_shutdown()"
>>>>> Changes v5 -> v6:
>>>>> 1, move "fixup" patches to the start of the patch set.
>>>>> 2, change patch 1, 2, 6's subject to make it tell more what it's
>>>>> about.
>>>>> 3, add Fixes for patch 3.
>>>>> 4, adjuest the changes format for patch 6.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Xianting Tian (6):
>>>>> RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
>>>>> RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs
>>>>> RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
>>>>> RISC-V: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
>>>>> RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
>>>>> Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64
>>>>>
>>>>> .../admin-guide/kdump/vmcoreinfo.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_save_regs.S | 2 +-
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++---
>>>>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 4 +++
>>>>> 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
>>>> Thank. I've taken the first 4 onto for-next, which is still targeted
>>>> for 5.20, as they're fixes. I'm not opposed to taking the documentation
>>>> patch for this cycle as well, it just needs some going-over as the
>>>> wording looks very odd (or at least it does to me right now, maybe I'm
>>>> just still half asleep). Patch 5 is a new feature, and given that it's
>>>> being spun during the merge window it's too late.
>>> Hi Palmer
>>>
>>> Do you plan to merge the two patch to Linux 6.1 to support crash tool work?
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
>> 357628e68f5c ("RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context"
>>
>>> RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs
>> 59c026c359c3 ("RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs")
>>
>> Hey Xianting, those two commits already seem to have been applied, do
>> you perhaps instead mean the documentation patch and the addition of
>> support for arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo? I recalled asking if you needed
>> to respin at the time, but do not see a response:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/39fdc85e-b2d5-863c-4878-4b3380d76bc4@microchip.com/
>> IIRC Bagas had some outstanding comments on the documentation change
>> too. Was I incorrect?
>
>Sorry, It is the two patches:
>
> RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64
>
>I saw Palmer already merged the two patches to his riscv-crash branch, it means they are OK?
Dunno, but no harm in resending given it's been a while cycle since then.
>
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-crash
>
>I saw Bagas's comments, I will send new version patch for the two patches, thanks for the reminder.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-11 7:41 Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 2/6] RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown() Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] RISC-V: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 7:41 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64 Xianting Tian
2022-08-11 13:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-08-11 15:45 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] RISC-V fixups to work with crash tool Conor.Dooley
2022-08-11 16:17 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-08-12 3:23 ` Xianting Tian
2022-09-15 18:57 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-10-12 9:42 ` Xianting Tian
2022-10-12 9:52 ` Conor Dooley
2022-10-13 2:28 ` Xianting Tian
2022-10-13 5:24 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-10-13 9:26 ` Xianting Tian
2022-10-14 7:53 ` Xianting Tian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=crash-utility@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
--cc=hschauhan@nulltrace.org \
--cc=k-hagio-ab@nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yixun.lan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®