From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailtransmit05.runbox.com (mailtransmit05.runbox.com [185.226.149.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA58231A55 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 20:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.226.149.38 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765226972; cv=none; b=Kv84F0NiHFNjBToTp2PR2vMoOi6hu+1v7KrvrW/0j6s1tswcpvougRrizsgnISvOTx+7WfhTADXKQV8ngNw+sqZibQF4V5jaAaivlUV+VGUmUrH0kwWMV7yvixN8/Wv7ZBIgJlwUtUPpXU9KdjfawSZbQEm8xUFFBJMS4D9g/5M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765226972; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e+fFu2MdeHsUlyFQOUVeOgFYYMMaZGZ18DAtl6FoP0I=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dZXlyuMI7R8liewdTWyAPt0Foou21QFCPV59+uH9PXZtoE+5yhyg+dsVmI2xbLvol4UVe7NcEaQSNrc2tr/uwiiWzalvFoqO9u3KdtnaJOACo1X5q4oJqSHvhlPd8AvslSYYhPAo7ZMycsjI9HElj7mO6UVULLKs6CunML82/1Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gibson.sh; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gibson.sh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gibson.sh header.i=@gibson.sh header.b=HyWhzDTt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.226.149.38 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gibson.sh Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gibson.sh Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gibson.sh header.i=@gibson.sh header.b="HyWhzDTt" Received: from mailtransmit03.runbox ([10.9.9.163] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit05.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1vSiAO-00EY2P-27; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 21:49:08 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gibson.sh; s=selector2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=U7ZnXGxKhhwonAbIYoP4Tqgk8CKODIyRTD+Tp0bmyzc=; b=HyWhzDTtmrAA78y5i3OdbtChpH CgHlgZCFe4oZh1E34H+h5l5lbkNz4oldEis4vsKojWCKNKK8xSQ973/MNeUB6/jDG4ZPwOJGJHEBG 0CPOKMBuHhEcB3NVAg6gCEdcGdLDlScpvaa5eABzkNGoS7gK4Ap2Y3zTObalYCksJqi8seoZ5tbo2 cB9qAV4N54BKTFJ9BXKVdBWfs5lMabo5Z9sjEzjL6RN6Wmj4XYa2yAWV2ReTs4/MN13J8hNWuVWTX F0B1QAUmmZs8xwrpFLLc2ZLhSbaUdVyrT0v9AkNOBCWpf4mJqPrgYbt2DTYydW1nSC99p3/vgruEu m2djTlpw==; Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1vSiAM-0000cK-4Z; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 21:49:06 +0100 Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (1104311)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1vSiAC-00An5I-7t; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 21:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: <22ae55db-261d-4bb7-a83c-12fd00fa5527@gibson.sh> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 21:48:54 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] gpio: it87: use new line value setter callbacks To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Lixu Zhang , Sakari Ailus , Yinbo Zhu References: <20250423-gpiochip-set-rv-gpio-part2-v1-0-b22245cde81a@linaro.org> <20250423-gpiochip-set-rv-gpio-part2-v1-5-b22245cde81a@linaro.org> From: Daniel Gibson Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/8/25 05:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > Thanks for bringing it to my attention, you're probably right and thats's > just an unintentional omission on my part. Do you want to send a patch that > will fix it or do you prefer me to do it? > > Bart Thanks for the quick reply! I'd prefer if you do it, I'm not too familiar with the kernel workflow. Cheers, Daniel