mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"open list:TI ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER (CPSW)" 
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: OMAP_GPMC should depend on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_K3
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:40:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ed864d-8d71-7042-4d55-2b0b65d4d281@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVXHSnOOnn3jchezQc+bsPYTnSPuw_rOe+pyskAVaQGnQ@mail.gmail.com>

Geert,

On 10/05/2022 10:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 9:22 AM Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 09/05/2022 16:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> The Texas Instruments OMAP General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC) is
>>> only present on TI OMAP2/3/4/5, AM33xx, AM43x, DRA7xx, TI81xx, and K3
>>> SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_K3, to prevent
>>> asking the user about this driver when configuring a kernel without
>>> OMAP2+ or K3 SoC family support.
>>>
>>> Fixes: be34f45f0d4aa91c ("memory: omap-gpmc: Make OMAP_GPMC config visible and selectable")
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> 
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
>>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ config TI_EMIF
>>>  config OMAP_GPMC
>>>       tristate "Texas Instruments OMAP SoC GPMC driver"
>>>       depends on OF_ADDRESS
>>> +     depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
>>>       select GPIOLIB
>>>       help
>>>         This driver is for the General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC)
>>
>> Is there any possibility that CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN is not set while both
>> OF_ADDRESS and COMPILE_TEST are set?
>>
>> That particular case will lead to build failures.
>>
>> e.g.
>> https://krzk.eu/#/builders/63/builds/162
> 
> So it needs an additional dependency on IRQ_DOMAIN.
> That is a pre-existing problem, not caused by my patch (which adds
> more dependencies, and doesn't remove any).

Fair enough.

Could you please also add ARCH_KEYSTONE in the 'depends on' list
as some SoCs in that architecture do have the GPMC block.

cheers,
-roger

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09 13:48 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-10  7:22 ` Roger Quadros
2022-05-10  7:30   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-10  7:36     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-10  7:41       ` Roger Quadros
2022-05-10  7:40     ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2022-05-10  8:06       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-10  8:10         ` Roger Quadros
2022-05-10  8:17           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-10  8:27             ` Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22ed864d-8d71-7042-4d55-2b0b65d4d281@kernel.org \
    --to=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®