From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: stefan@agner.ch, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Warning when using eMMC and partprobe: generic_make_request: Trying to write to read-only block-device
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:24:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22fff85b-63e5-3cfe-0e72-255044e53bab@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwyCmYfUrGt61d-6B=1XiTLoudNO=_bQ9-g_rDg8Ao_VA@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/14/18 10:22 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like it's coming from that fsync():
>>
>> sys_fsync
>> do_fsync
>> vfs_fsync_range
>> blkdev_fsync
>> blkdev_issue_flush
>>
>> I think we need to teach blkdev_issue_flush() to bail out if the bdev
>> is read-only, similar to blkdev_issue_discard(), _write_zeroes(), etc.
>> The question is which error code to use. blkdev_fsync() already skips
>> over EOPNOTSUPP, so it is a (no-so-good) option. Other blkdev_issue_
>> functions return EPERM.
>
> Oh, just make issue_flush() return EROFS for a read-only device.
>
> Or maybe we should even just consider the flush to be a read operation?
>
> But I guess the error code gets percolated all the way to user space?
> The safest option might just be to return 0.
We probably just want to special case a flush for this check. In other
situations, like resource allocation and issue, we'd want to consider
it a write.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-14 14:41 Stefan Agner
2018-08-14 15:24 ` Ilya Dryomov
2018-08-14 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-14 16:24 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-08-14 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-08-14 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-14 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22fff85b-63e5-3cfe-0e72-255044e53bab@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®