From: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
To: "Qiling Zhu" <kmatzkaczor244@gmail.com>,
"Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
"Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Andrea Rabbaglietti <rabbagliettiandrea@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Griffin Kroah-Hartman <griffin@kroah.com>,
vishnuocv@gmail.com, vsankar@lenovo.com,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support for auto keyboard backlight
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 15:52:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <230263171c25c322d97fa29439a01922db47f913.camel@rong.moe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114174814.62153-1-kmatzkaczor244@gmail.com>
Hi Qiling,
Thanks for working on this.
On Sun, 2026-11-15 at 01:48 +0800, Qiling Zhu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks, Rong, for the two rounds of detailed review, Vishnu and Mark
> for the firmware-side answers, and Andrea for the bug report that
> became the first patch. This v3 addresses the feedback in full; the
> series grew from two to seven patches to pick up the suggested
> structure and to make the fixes independently backportable.
The next time when you send a series (i.e., PATCH x/n, n > 1), please do
not reply to the previous thread to keep it tidy.
>
> The series in short:
>
> 1/7 Report auto mode as brightness 0 instead of 3 (stable fix)
> 2/7 Extract kbdlight_notify_change() helpers (refactor)
> 3/7 Sync LED core state on level writes (write-path sync)
> 4/7 Detect auto-mode capability via MLCG bit 20 (groundwork)
> 5/7 Skip LED suspend/resume on auto-mode machines
> 6/7 Add support for auto keyboard backlight (the feature)
> 7/7 Reconcile EC level on resume
>
> Changes since v2, by comment:
>
> * The notification path is now split as suggested: a helper that accepts
> a level and a wrapper that queries the EC (2/7), and the proc write
> path goes through it (3/7), like commit 07f48f668fac did for the
> ideapad FnLock LED. The manual check-then-act trigger removal is gone
> entirely; leaving auto mode through either interface now drops the
> trigger through the LED core.
>
> * LED suspend/resume is skipped entirely on machines that support auto
> mode, keyed on the capability bit rather than the current level (5/7),
> as suggested. My testing confirms the firmware restores the previous
> level on its own in all cases except auto mode across hibernation;
> less state remains in the driver, and the class of races around
> LED_SUSPENDED disappears.
>
> * activate() is now a one-liner with no read-back verification (6/7);
> it only writes the level, using the plain set helper. I did not use
> the updating wrapper there on purpose: the trigger core is in the
> middle of its own activation flow at that point, and the 0x1012 event
> that follows the level change is expected to bring the state back in
> sync through the regular notify path.
>
> * Trigger registration is gated on MLCG bit 20 as per Vishnu's
> confirmation (4/7 + 6/7).
>
> * Andrea's report is fixed by 1/7, which reports auto mode as 0 to the
> LED classdev and is marked for stable. It is deliberately minimal -
> a single check, no further splitting - to keep backporting easy.
>
> * On the proc attribute deprecation: I support the idea, deferring to
> the thinkpad_acpi maintainers.
>
> One addition that was not in v2: testing showed that the firmware does
> not restore auto mode across hibernation
>
How about s2idle? And what if hw brightness = [0,2] before hibernation?
Meanwhile, could you test s2idle, hibernation and cold boots with
thinkpad_acpi blacklisted to see if hw brightness ([0,2] and 3) is
preserved? We need the raw behavior to determine our strategy.
> - the EC comes back with the
> backlight off, without an event. Rather than re-attaching the trigger
> from the pre-suspend state,
>
"re-attaching"
I am not familiar with hibernation, so I am not sure if the LED core
would detach the trigger before entering hibernation. If not, why did you
say that?
Thanks,
Rong
> 7/7 simply re-reads the EC level on resume
> and routes it through the regular notification path. If the firmware
> exits auto mode across hibernation, the driver simply reflects the
> resulting EC state rather than restoring the previous mode: it stays
> out of the firmware's way and only synchronizes, which keeps the code
> simple. Happy to hear opinions.
>
> A few notes on the result:
>
> * Writing a level through either interface now also emits
> brightness_hw_changed: both write paths share the same notify helper,
> which keeps the LED core and userspace listeners consistent with the
> new level no matter which interface was used. Rewriting the current
> level emits nothing, matching the firmware's own
> no-event-on-same-level semantics. Extending the notification to
> userspace-initiated changes seemed reasonable to me - the OSD then
> also reflects echo-based changes - but I'm happy to restrict it to
> hardware-initiated transitions if that is considered the better
> semantics.
>
> * All state transitions now run under kbdlight_mutex in single
> critical sections (query + reconcile, write + reconcile), with the
> set and notify helpers expecting the caller to hold it. On the
> ordering with the LED core's trigger_lock, my reasoning is that the
> trigger callbacks (activate, hw_offloaded) are reached with
> trigger_lock held and then take kbdlight_mutex, while the
> notification helper is lock-free (it only queues the worker), so I
> don't see a reverse nesting. Extra eyes on this are welcome.
>
> * The cached level is now the raw EC level including auto mode, so the
> kbdlight_brightness name has drifted a bit from what it holds.
> Renaming it would touch quite a few places; I left it as is for now
> and can do the rename as a follow-up if preferred.
>
> One open question, mainly for Mark and Vishnu: the skip of LED
> suspend/resume assumes the firmware turns the backlight off on suspend
> and restores it on resume on all auto-mode capable machines, which is
> what I observed here for manual levels (suspend and hibernation), auto
> across suspend, and auto across hibernation coming back off. My belief
> is that most machines handle this fine, but more testing on other
> models or a look at the EC documentation from the Lenovo side would be
> needed to be sure; if an exception turns up, a DMI quirk could restore
> the old path for that machine.
>
> Tested on my ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 (linux-next next-20261030).
>
> I'm still learning the ways of upstream; thank you all for your time
> and reviews, and any further comments are most welcome.
>
> This series was developed with LLM assistance; I reviewed every design
> decision against the framework sources and validated the behavior on
> real hardware myself.
>
> Regards,
> Qiling Zhu
>
> Qiling Zhu (7):
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Report auto keyboard backlight mode as off
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Extract kbdlight_notify_change() helpers
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Sync LED core state on level writes
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Detect auto-mode capability via MLCG
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Skip LED suspend/resume on auto-mode machines
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support for auto keyboard backlight
> platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Reconcile EC level on resume
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 10:01 [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Qiling Zhu
2026-11-01 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Qiling Zhu
2026-11-01 18:24 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-01 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Rong Zhang
2026-11-04 4:57 ` Vishnu Sankar
2026-11-02 15:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " Qiling Zhu
2026-11-02 15:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Extract kbdlight_notify_change() helper Qiling Zhu
2026-11-02 15:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support for auto keyboard backlight Qiling Zhu
2026-11-02 18:32 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-02 18:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " Rong Zhang
2026-11-05 13:18 ` Qiling Zhu
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: " Qiling Zhu
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Report auto keyboard backlight mode as off Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 7:53 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Extract kbdlight_notify_change() helpers Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 7:53 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Sync LED core state on level writes Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 8:05 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Detect auto-mode capability via MLCG Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 8:05 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Skip LED suspend/resume on auto-mode machines Qiling Zhu
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support for auto keyboard backlight Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 8:17 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Reconcile EC level on resume Qiling Zhu
2026-11-15 8:20 ` Rong Zhang
2026-11-15 7:52 ` Rong Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=230263171c25c322d97fa29439a01922db47f913.camel@rong.moe \
--to=i@rong.moe \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=griffin@kroah.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kmatzkaczor244@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rabbagliettiandrea@gmail.com \
--cc=vishnuocv@gmail.com \
--cc=vsankar@lenovo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®