From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753442AbcBENlG (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:41:06 -0500 Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:60834 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752657AbcBENlE (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:41:04 -0500 From: Stephan Mueller To: Marcus Meissner Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: testmgr: mark more algorithms as FIPS compliant Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:41:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2304471.iOLiAjeuEP@tauon.atsec.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.3.4-300.fc23.x86_64; KDE/4.14.16; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1454678545-7420-1-git-send-email-meissner@suse.de> References: <1454678545-7420-1-git-send-email-meissner@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2016, 14:22:25 schrieb Marcus Meissner: Hi Marcus, >Some more authenc() wrapped algorithms are FIPS compliant, tag >them as such. Is this patch a duplication of the first one? Ciao Stephan