From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: perf: is it possible to userspace rdpmc but only on a certain core type
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:30:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <231048a3-8d7b-4bc9-a3d2-697e00da2c8c@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121125230.GD7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2025-01-21 07:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 11:44:37AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025-01-17 5:04 p.m., Vince Weaver wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> so we've been working on PAPI support for Intel Top-Down events, which
>>> let's say does "exciting" things involving the rdpmc instruction.
>>>
>>> One issue we are having is that on a hybrid machine (Raptor Lake in this
>>> case with performance/efficiency cores) there is no top-down support
>>> for the E-cores, and it will gpf/segfault if you try to rdpmc the top-down
>>> events.
>>>
>>> Obviously PAPI would like to avoid this, and somehow only run the rdpmc
>>> from userspace if scheduled on a P-core.
>>>
>>> Is there any way to atomically do this? Somehow detect what core we are
>>> on and atomically execute a userspace instruction before a core-reschedule
>>> can happen?
>>>
>>> Or barring that, any other way to handle this in a way that won't crash
>>> without having to have the users have to bind to a core any time they want
>>> to run PAPI?
>>
>> Can the PAPI rely on the event_idx(), similar to what Andi's pmu-tools
>> do? For a stopped event, the index is always 0.
>
> That's not race-free, the task can get migrated to an E core the moment
> after you done the load and before the rdpmc instruction.
>
> I suppose you can wrap the whole thing in RSEQ though, it's a bit of a
> pain, but RSEQ can be configured to abort on migration.
>
> The very latest libc (2.35+) should have rseq registered by default,
> older will have to do so itself -- there is example code in
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq but also
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git
Indeed, you could start from a copy of this function:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git/tree/include/rseq/arch/x86/bits.h#n161
and tweak it to issue "rdpmc" rather than "addq", thus creating a helper
such as:
int rseq_try_rdpmc(params..., int cpu);
(e.g. return 0 on success, -1 on abort)
and use it as such from C (untested code snippet):
static inline bool rseq_rdpmc(params...)
{
bool rdpmc_issued = false;
for (;;) {
int cpu = rseq_current_cpu();
if (!cpu_is_p_core(cpu))
break;
if (!rseq_try_rdpmc(params..., cpu)) {
rdpmc_issued = true;
break;
}
}
return rdpmc_issued;
}
The rseq critical section in rseq_try_rdpmc will either abort if migrated
elsewhere, else it will issue the rdpmc instruction if it is still on the
right cpu when the instruction is executed.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-21 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 22:04 Vince Weaver
2025-01-20 16:44 ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-21 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-21 14:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-01-22 21:51 ` Vince Weaver
2025-01-23 18:14 ` Andi Kleen
2025-01-23 19:45 ` Vince Weaver
2025-01-24 5:18 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=231048a3-8d7b-4bc9-a3d2-697e00da2c8c@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome