From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org
Cc: dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srini@kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, sre@kernel.org,
krzk@kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_wcheng@quicinc.com, melody.olvera@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_nsekar@quicinc.com, ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com,
abelvesa@kernel.org, luca.weiss@fairphone.com,
konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com, mitltlatltl@gmail.com,
krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/12] SPMI: Implement sub-devices and migrate drivers
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:45:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <231214ab-9ae9-4e3f-a75b-d65a597e9956@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721093626.96264-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
On 7/21/26 11:36, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Changes in v13:
> - Removed `if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))` check in spmi_dev_release (Andy)
> - Rebased (though still applies cleanly) over next-20260720
>
Is there any further comment on this series?
Cheers,
Angelo
> Changes in v12:
> - Removed call to of_node_put() for failure as it's being already
> done in spmi_dev_release(), as pointed out by Sashiko
> - Fixed usage of the new helper in all users (it's too hot today, sorry)
>
> Changes in v11:
> - Use kzalloc_obj() in spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> - Introduced new helper to get a parent SPMI device which verifies
> both if the device has parent and if that parent is effectively
> a SPMI device type
> - Removed dev->parent NULL checks in all migration code, as that
> is now being checked in the new helper instead, reducing the
> amount of required lines of code to instantiate a SPMI subdevice
> - Moved of_node reference dropping to dev release callback (Sashiko)
> - Rebased over next-20260706
>
> Changes in v10:
> - Add use-after-free fix rebased to before this series, as the v1 of
> that did not apply cleanly on a tree without this series applied
> - Replace unsafe to_spmi_device() with spmi_find_device_by_of_node() (Sashiko)
> - Fix -Wformat warning in dev_set_name call (Sashiko)
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Added check for dev->parent where missing (Sashiko)
> - Changed %d to %u in dev_set_name() call as arg is unsigned (Sashiko)
> - Propagating error code from devm_regmap_init_spmi_ext() instead of
> returning -ENODEV in phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c (Sashiko)
> - Rebased over next-20260605 (no conflicts anyway)
>
> Changes in v8:
> - Renamed *res to *sub_sdev in devm_spmi_subdevice_remove() (Andy)
> - Changed kerneldoc wording to "error pointer" for function
> spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() (Andy)
> - Shuffled around some assignments in spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() (Andy)
> - Used device_property_read_u32() instead of of_property_read_u32()
> in all of the migrated drivers (Andy)
> - Changed .max_register field in all of the migrated drivers from
> 0x100 to 0xff (Andy)
> - Kept `sta1` declaration in reversed xmas tree order in function
> iadc_poll_wait_eoc() of qcom-spmi-iadc.c (Andy)
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Added commit to cleanup redundant dev_name() in the pre-existing
> spmi_device_add() function
> - Added commit removing unneeded goto and improving spmi_device_add()
> readability by returning error in error path, and explicitly zero
> for success at the end.
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Added commit to convert spmi.c to %pe error format and used
> %pe error format in spmi_subdevice code as wanted by Uwe Kleine-Konig
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Changed dev_err to dev_err_probe in qcom-spmi-sdam (and done
> that even though I disagree - because I wanted this series to
> *exclusively* introduce the minimum required changes to
> migrate to the new API, but okay, whatever....!);
> - Added missing REGMAP dependency in Kconfig for qcom-spmi-sdam,
> phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater and qcom-coincell to resolve build
> issues when the already allowed COMPILE_TEST is enabled
> as pointed out by the test robot's randconfig builds.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Added selection of REGMAP_SPMI in Kconfig for qcom-coincell and
> for phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater to resolve undefined references when
> compiled with some randconfig
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fixed importing "SPMI" namespace in spmi-devres.c
> - Removed all instances of defensive programming, as pointed out by
> jic23 and Sebastian
> - Removed explicit casting as pointed out by jic23
> - Moved ida_free call to spmi_subdev_release() and simplified error
> handling in spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() as pointed out by jic23
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed missing `sparent` initialization in phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater
> - Changed val_bits to 8 in all Qualcomm drivers to ensure
> compatibility as suggested by Casey
> - Added struct device pointer in all conversion commits as suggested
> by Andy
> - Exported newly introduced functions with a new "SPMI" namespace
> and imported the same in all converted drivers as suggested by Andy
> - Added missing error checking for dev_set_name() call in spmi.c
> as suggested by Andy
> - Added comma to last entry of regmap_config as suggested by Andy
>
> While adding support for newer MediaTek platforms, featuring complex
> SPMI PMICs, I've seen that those SPMI-connected chips are internally
> divided in various IP blocks, reachable in specific contiguous address
> ranges... more or less like a MMIO, but over a slow SPMI bus instead.
>
> I recalled that Qualcomm had something similar... and upon checking a
> couple of devicetrees, yeah - indeed it's the same over there.
>
> What I've seen then is a common pattern of reading the "reg" property
> from devicetree in a struct member and then either
> A. Wrapping regmap_{read/write/etc}() calls in a function that adds
> the register base with "base + ..register", like it's done with
> writel()/readl() calls; or
> B. Doing the same as A. but without wrapper functions.
>
> Even though that works just fine, in my opinion it's wrong.
>
> The regmap API is way more complex than MMIO-only readl()/writel()
> functions for multiple reasons (including supporting multiple busses
> like SPMI, of course) - but everyone seemed to forget that regmap
> can manage register base offsets transparently and automatically in
> its API functions by simply adding a `reg_base` to the regmap_config
> structure, which is used for initializing a `struct regmap`.
>
> So, here we go: this series implements the software concept of an SPMI
> Sub-Device (which, well, also reflects how Qualcomm and MediaTek's
> actual hardware is laid out anyway).
>
> SPMI Controller
> | ______
> | / Sub-Device 1
> V /
> SPMI Device (PMIC) ----------- Sub-Device 2
> \
> \______ Sub-Device 3
>
> As per this implementation, an SPMI Sub-Device can be allocated/created
> and added in any driver that implements a... well.. subdevice (!) with
> an SPMI "main" device as its parent: this allows to create and finally
> to correctly configure a regmap that is specific to the sub-device,
> operating on its specific address range and reading, and writing, to
> its registers with the regmap API taking care of adding the base address
> of a sub-device's registers as per regmap API design.
>
> All of the SPMI Sub-Devices are therefore added as children of the SPMI
> Device (usually a PMIC), as communication depends on the PMIC's SPMI bus
> to be available (and the PMIC to be up and running, of course).
>
> Summarizing the dependency chain (which is obvious to whoever knows what
> is going on with Qualcomm and/or MediaTek SPMI PMICs):
> "SPMI Sub-Device x...N" are children "SPMI Device"
> "SPMI Device" is a child of "SPMI Controller"
>
> (that was just another way to say the same thing as the graph above anyway).
>
> Along with the new SPMI Sub-Device registration functions, I have also
> performed a conversion of some Qualcomm SPMI drivers and only where the
> actual conversion was trivial.
>
> I haven't included any conversion of more complex Qualcomm SPMI drivers
> because I don't have the required bandwidth to do so (and besides, I think,
> but haven't exactly verified, that some of those require SoCs that I don't
> have for testing anyway).
>
>
> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (12):
> spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference
> spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add()
> spmi: Print error status with %pe format
> spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path
> spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant
> spmi: Add helper to get a parent SPMI device
> nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> power: reset: qcom-pon: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Migrate to
> devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> misc: qcom-coincell: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Migrate to
> devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
> iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions
>
> drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-iadc.c | 116 ++++++++---------
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c | 45 +++++--
> drivers/nvmem/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c | 41 ++++--
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 2 +
> .../phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c | 52 +++++---
> drivers/power/reset/qcom-pon.c | 31 +++--
> drivers/spmi/spmi-devres.c | 24 ++++
> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/spmi.h | 17 +++
> 11 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 9:36 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 01/12] spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-17 15:39 ` Abel Vesa
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 02/12] spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 03/12] spmi: Print error status with %pe format AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 04/12] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-17 15:41 ` Abel Vesa
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 05/12] spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-17 15:40 ` Abel Vesa
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 06/12] spmi: Add helper to get a parent SPMI device AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-27 14:26 ` Abel Vesa
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 07/12] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 08/12] power: reset: qcom-pon: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 09/12] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 10/12] misc: qcom-coincell: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 11/12] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-21 9:36 ` [PATCH v13 12/12] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-17 14:45 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=231214ab-9ae9-4e3f-a75b-d65a597e9956@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=melody.olvera@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=mitltlatltl@gmail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=quic_nsekar@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®