Re: CVE-2023-52572: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread()

[Robert Frohl <rfrohl@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --]

Hi Redhat Security,

could you have a look and update the entry for CVE-2023-1192, if you 
agree that CVE-2023-52572 is a duplicate and the referenced patch for 
CVE-2023-1192 is incorrect ?

Thanks,
Robert

On 05.03.24 12:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:38:49AM +0100, Robert Frohl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this seems to be a duplicate of CVE-2023-1192 [0], even though NVD lists
>> another, wrong patch. The RH bug has more details [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> [0] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1192
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154178#c28
> 
> That's a mess.  Please have RH update the json entry with CVE with the
> correct git commit id and then I'll be glad to revoke this.  The
> information in NVD is not "real" from the point of view of the CVE
> database, so I can't take information there as being correct, or not.
> As you know, NVD is just an add-on for CVE entries, one of many created
> by many different groups/governments.
> 
> Until it's fixed in the CVE database, this CVE should stand as it refers
> to the correct fix that people need to know about, not the incorrect one
> in the RH-assigned CVE.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

-- 
Security Engineer, SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 
146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner 
Knoblich (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
GPG: D29F 82AA 9FD5 9D6E 74B1  6370 089E DB3D 230A 2404

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 12035 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]