From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751734AbdB1X0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:26:23 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:50461 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752060AbdB1XZF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:25:05 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fixes related to limis Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:05 +0100 Message-ID: <2326598.n0dkg1GrdM@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2694426.SgxlQuL17D@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <2694426.SgxlQuL17D@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 02:13:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > Both fix some utter confusion in the sysfs interface. > > The first one makes intel_pstate_update_policies() end up with limits set to > the same value that it was set to initially. > > The second one avoids reinitializing limits in intel_pstate_set_policy() when > the moon phase is right and the wind blows from a specific direction. Resending an updated series, because patch [1/3] required a rework and I found one more problem (addressed by patch [3/3]). Thanks, Rafael