From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1164095AbdEXNtj (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2017 09:49:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60694 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1164077AbdEXNtf (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2017 09:49:35 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com EE46CC04B94B Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dhowells@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com EE46CC04B94B Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20170523220546.16758-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> References: <20170523220546.16758-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org, liqin.linux@gmail.com, lennox.wu@gmail.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Unify the various copies of libgcc into lib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23395.1495633764.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:24 +0100 Message-ID: <23396.1495633764@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 24 May 2017 13:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > ... Unfortunately I don't actually have all these cross compilers setup... If you have Fedora, you have the following available as standard RPMs: gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu gcc-alpha-linux-gnu gcc-arm-linux-gnu gcc-avr32-linux-gnu gcc-bfin-linux-gnu gcc-c6x-linux-gnu gcc-cris-linux-gnu gcc-frv-linux-gnu gcc-h8300-linux-gnu gcc-hppa-linux-gnu gcc-hppa64-linux-gnu gcc-ia64-linux-gnu gcc-m32r-linux-gnu gcc-m68k-linux-gnu gcc-microblaze-linux-gnu gcc-mips64-linux-gnu gcc-mn10300-linux-gnu gcc-nios2-linux-gnu gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu gcc-ppc64-linux-gnu gcc-s390x-linux-gnu gcc-sh-linux-gnu gcc-sparc64-linux-gnu gcc-tile-linux-gnu gcc-xtensa-linux-gnu They're built from the same sources as the gcc rpm (and the matching binutils cross rpms are built from the same sources as the binutils rpm) - it's only the spec file that's different, and they lag a bit behind the core gcc/binutils as they only get updated after those change. So in Fedora 25 these are all gcc-6 and in Fedora 26 they're all gcc-7. David