From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755104AbdKATht (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:37:49 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:59095 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbdKAThq (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:37:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [v2] can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink() To: Oliver Hartkopp , Marc Kleine-Budde , Wolfgang Grandegger , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <2e600d9a-faec-dd39-08f0-5a7fb260d7ca@users.sourceforge.net> <2ab5d794-7a5c-9036-835c-67cfcc541795@hartkopp.net> <264b3c2b-8354-5769-639c-ac8d2fcbe630@hartkopp.net> <23fbbdba-fb11-a6bc-7d6a-4af43ef79503@users.sourceforge.net> <08fd31d5-8677-81e7-65d6-40d501017db6@hartkopp.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <2346609d-85f6-6eec-e492-d15ba1b6489a@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:37:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <08fd31d5-8677-81e7-65d6-40d501017db6@hartkopp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jx9J18OWYkzDGZ4usGBizMrtTZs/krVPGo2w2ti7r7ft1z6OPsZ XstY8Ci2AbyIqH1Fbl7Ku6OOlpHB8CR3XndQ/ntzgC3b7Kp2kWN+1otj0LniLykzDInbb7+ KBaj5e+VQVZKoDB+dX57XfEMAZ3oqNljouGY4EmBk1D9VJKpMidgeU1wJqvSE4UcV3xsuEA +x1+FLis2sItHanG7DMpQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PJmhrcP9Aa4=:7ufuFu7n4+ME2z+pFgNKhN MBDpJ0kEr5i5d8RayuX3vAzTMxaFbKec3wTVJNVFIpeV58at4a97G9KwTWii3lmtQIzdtcl+W ReSZpvB/mqhl6seVuBPimJ7U1WkvDGgrqHQwUDrLp3mbHYCLEiQ52Bd4aNy/qQ221aX/i+sO8 Y2ZKV/7W1TuADQ6VCowGxpGCtH1au2n5LKx6xkY3ny/yaRWoiduVnf7jlOCCUpoBX5/UXZJXW mFxB2svb4/Zoe0NPWn7DqnTRDZg/QYwbNBev41QhtYM+7vRujyckI081bxBiQhBTLvnjlxmhY 42bEUjhmWVuYSbmGX3SmzAU7G0zzPqu8XJcmPGowbe6er/Wt/YvA25OvjoRUq4bJnBeKYlIWu ONyuW6UTkY7msx3zLt9exXAv9bKiRp6OEcDCBsKoghCwT5dVfrIyDZ43wfIMStHKk5mmxKLFM 8UDbO5E84Eq7uuRhjU38vpec/tZxtZVJHtwjaNbcuZW5ifPcaUb6wXjLos0SJBIm8GG4dRXRj xFJR0Vq389bQXpM0f4IbqPgk5tdHsaMnPWecPTGSNn8O+ltN6BA4/hKBpa65zJ+jDi+Pycs2u HuQeclGx2YZ5LqW6Du4jURrl7zPvlXKfj6jyDCm6I5T8VzRB3HIc/KJlHIAeAVSHpkpm0X7nr WfkEZEcbVUuVFvad/U+nTUdQa0fE+HbCZ3IDnjY/vOw4Cywut/FkolE1u+WJ4acWUFiq1flxa eN4yr8D2mvHIcyXn6cvzx+v4TVr7wXN9+iHXCAPz5/q25V1TrWnK4m2uuioOX8DMA3TBlqLE5 1uDxP48lyQ694CxgklGrYw+IcRBOH00OPdFctRmPmqejVx+qxE= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp Thanks for another positive feedback. > Again: Posting such a patch on linux-can@vger.kernel.org is ENOUGH! I was informed in an other way for Linux software patches. > No need to cross post such a patch additionally on > > netdev@vger.kernel.org > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org These addresses were suggested (or recommended?) by the script “get_maintainer.pl”. > kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org I tend to add this address also for my update suggestions. > and to each of the maintainers … > We all subscribed the mailing list and listen to it. This is generally fine. - But I do not know how long such subscriptions will be active. > That's the intention of a mailing list ... I know … > Cross posting is not appreciated in the community. How does this view fit to the information in the section “5) Select the recipients for your patch” from the document “submitting-patches.rst”? Regards, Markus