From: "Stefan O'Rear" <sorear@fastmail.com>
To: "yunhui cui" <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH] riscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:53:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <234c458c-15f1-423f-a2fd-0abfc6232c66@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEEQ3w=yNEktgUucmKuUvqfwDYYztVX+jofi5Q7hG-yQWcLbTA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, at 4:43 AM, yunhui cui wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:14 PM Stefan O'Rear <sorear@fastmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> childregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread
>> in user context. For a kernel thread, childregs->gp is never used since
>> the kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the
>> gp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other
>> means.
>>
>> Fixes: 7db91e57a0ac ("RISC-V: Task implementation")
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan O'Rear <sorear@fastmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>> index 92922dbd5b5c..51042f48da17 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>> #include <asm/vector.h>
>> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>
>> -register unsigned long gp_in_global __asm__("gp");
>> -
>> #if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) && !defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK)
>> #include <linux/stackprotector.h>
>> unsigned long __stack_chk_guard __read_mostly;
>> @@ -207,7 +205,6 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
>> if (unlikely(args->fn)) {
>> /* Kernel thread */
>> memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
>> - childregs->gp = gp_in_global;
>> /* Supervisor/Machine, irqs on: */
>> childregs->status = SR_PP | SR_PIE;
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>>
> Can you help express in more detail what the problem was before fixing it?
It's a KASLR bypass, since gp_in_global is the address of the kernel symbol
__global_pointer$.
The /* Kernel thread */ comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used
for user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or
when /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have
PF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.
childregs is the *user* context during syscall execution and it is observable
from userspace in at least five ways:
1. kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting
register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has
sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers
zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.
This is a bug in its own right, but I'm unwilling to bet that it is the only
way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.
2. ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread
before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only
happen at user/kernel boundaries.
3. /proc/*/task/*/syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for
user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the
registers it returns.
4. PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel
addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses
are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under
LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.
5. Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have
not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user
registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.
Does this help? How much of this should be in the commit message?
-s
> Thanks,
> Yunhui
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 6:12 Stefan O'Rear
2024-03-27 8:43 ` [External] " yunhui cui
2024-03-27 16:53 ` Stefan O'Rear [this message]
2024-03-28 12:09 ` yunhui cui
2024-04-02 9:21 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-04-04 20:13 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-04-04 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=234c458c-15f1-423f-a2fd-0abfc6232c66@app.fastmail.com \
--to=sorear@fastmail.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®