mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
	"'Dirk Brandewie'" <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"'Dirk Brandewie'" <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix setting max_perf_pct in performance policy
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:50:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2380747.QvGFG8o86Z@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413415011-31290-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>

On Thursday, October 16, 2014 01:16:51 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> Code which changes policy to powersave changes also max_policy_pct based on
> max_freq. Code which change max_perf_pct has upper limit base on value
> max_policy_pct. When policy is changing from powersave back to performance
> then max_policy_pct is not changed. Which means that changing max_perf_pct is
> not possible to high values if max_freq was too low in powersave policy.

Dirk, what do you think?

> Test case:
> 
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
> 800000
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> 3300000
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> performance
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
> 100
> 
> $ echo powersave > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> $ echo 800000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> $ echo 20 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
> 
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> powersave
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> 800000
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
> 20
> 
> $ echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> $ echo 3300000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> $ echo 100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
> 
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> performance
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> 3300000
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
> 24
> 
> And now intel_pstate driver allows to set maximal value for max_perf_pct based
> on max_policy_pct which is 24 for previous powersave max_freq 800000.
> 
> This patch will set default value for max_policy_pct when setting policy to
> performance so it will allow to set also max value for max_perf_pct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 0668b38..7547ab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
>  		limits.min_perf_pct = 100;
>  		limits.min_perf = int_tofp(1);
> +		limits.max_policy_pct = 100;
>  		limits.max_perf_pct = 100;
>  		limits.max_perf = int_tofp(1);
>  		limits.no_turbo = limits.turbo_disabled;
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-16  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-15 23:16 Pali Rohár
2014-10-16  8:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-16  8:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-10-16 15:05 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-10-21 13:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2380747.QvGFG8o86Z@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
    --cc=dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®