From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753209Ab3DVLts (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:49:48 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:40591 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752212Ab3DVLtr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:49:47 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Vinod Koul , Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , Viresh Kumar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , spear-devel , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] dmaengine: add ACPI DMA helpers and use them in dw_dmac Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:57:49 +0200 Message-ID: <2382527.O0vcbyEZOf@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.9.0-rc8+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1365505547-10552-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20130422055612.GE6081@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, April 22, 2013 01:07:39 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:14:47 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 22:06 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:05:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > > > There is a patch series which introduces ACPI DMA helpers in similar way like > >> > > > we have for DeviceTree. > >> > > > > >> > > > In addition it applies this to the first user, namely dw_dmac driver. > >> > > Applied w/o 3 & 5.2 they failed, can you pls rebase and resend > >> > > > >> > > >> > Actually those two (at least 5/5) can't be applied on top of slave-dma. > >> > The patches requires slave-dma and linux-pm together. I heard it's > >> > usually achieved by creating a specific branch in one subsystem > >> > (linux-pm in our case) for another. > >> > > >> > Rafael, what could we do here? > >> > >> I suppose Vinod can pull from my acpi-lpss (which is guaranteed not to be > >> rebased at this point) and apply the series on top of that. > > Or I can wait for rc1 and apply afterwards...? > > Mika and I have no objections to go this way. That'd be fine by me too. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.