From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpbg151.qq.com (smtpbg151.qq.com [18.169.211.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 424D613C3D5 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.169.211.239 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724859543; cv=none; b=KHbSqfNntsnVepZJtjaEMEoP8fnnXSVxySK1sQ7MHHXshgl5TcZ/KgQ9RTfQ4QL8rT/d5w992vchEN6Du6ZJm94/age97mpPWkixbA2ipDD+o7SMPcIjWqR52k/UjUnGDqIcPww6/ekid4hQjuAFVodWVA+HfSWqAthzP4JLkRA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724859543; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z3T/P26kCWt0cF5LnrM2IPK6DiNjzaAJMPDCeCPObCI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tUGfvqLNULiUqmwjLjhjQ+BXOkLR1VqwILbgC5Q/WmVcu/bEw0GDDmd+kZ/dsT1tjd9kjiLWx4sTvzDvc8+K8VIngAlj059kvwGVdINH49jii5CvX+Wsd09LU4B1kPn+T7DK1GLqasagZROnklqmZv1tD31EvXgB6pHmU34ZgO0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b=Yj45Lnl+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.169.211.239 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b="Yj45Lnl+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uniontech.com; s=onoh2408; t=1724859514; bh=oVnFuXZSAxbQ3NtiLiMpquUs3FMfEmgMHUpg/XfODWg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Yj45Lnl+kTK3NV+uWm88Y1pkN9bL46RCe4RBqZrz8hdqVp0RreO8Ym2zd61Pi9uDT nfGmyNVsjRBwCOobL9hDIhhMleQjj0HuWzMlsBsANDYPjkjGMuAy0bZTDMhHqWnHg6 RiIUm2XWm5Z6ZW/9V0tipTnx9i8+nvrPdTMZU4iY= X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp81t1724859480t6l336za X-QQ-Originating-IP: 0HJh7Yo1Jx8Lr3Nkdfttu+na0dkmiIavMKazTlQ2IrU= Received: from [10.20.53.89] ( [113.57.152.160]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:37:57 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000 X-QQ-GoodBg: 1 X-BIZMAIL-ID: 1561753365197894062 Message-ID: <23CC94B2018EE36C+e1d82597-6adf-4bcf-8e63-df788eb81bd0@uniontech.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:37:57 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: disable amdgpu_dpm on THTF-SW831-1W-DS25_MB board To: Mario Limonciello , alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, lijo.lazar@amd.com, le.ma@amd.com, Jun.Ma2@amd.com, hamza.mahfooz@amd.com, andrealmeid@igalia.com, wenlunpeng@uniontech.com Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guanwentao@uniontech.com, zhanjun@uniontech.com References: <3EA7C2B9E8C4D00A+20240828105938.37674-1-wangyuli@uniontech.com> From: WangYuli Autocrypt: addr=wangyuli@uniontech.com; keydata= xjMEZoEsiBYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAyDPzcbPnchbIhweThfNK1tg1imM+5kgDBJSKP+nX39DN IVdhbmdZdWxpIDx3YW5neXVsaUB1bmlvbnRlY2guY29tPsKJBBMWCAAxFiEEa1GMzYeuKPkg qDuvxdofMEb0C+4FAmaBLIgCGwMECwkIBwUVCAkKCwUWAgMBAAAKCRDF2h8wRvQL7g0UAQCH 3mrGM0HzOaARhBeA/Q3AIVfhS010a0MZmPTRGVfPbwD/SrncJwwPAL4GiLPEC4XssV6FPUAY 0rA68eNNI9cJLArOOARmgSyJEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdA88W4CTLDD9fKwW9PB5yurCNdWNS7 VTL0dvPDofBTjFYDAQgHwngEGBYIACAWIQRrUYzNh64o+SCoO6/F2h8wRvQL7gUCZoEsiQIb DAAKCRDF2h8wRvQL7sKvAP4mBvm7Zn1OUjFViwkma8IGRGosXAvMUFyOHVcl1RTgFQEAuJkU o9ERi7qS/hbUdUgtitI89efbY0TVetgDsyeQiwU= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:uniontech.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz8a-1 On 2024/8/28 23:19, Mario Limonciello wrote: > This is production hardware? Unfortunately, this device was released quite a while back. > > Have you already checked whether a BIOS upgrade for the device could > help this issue? Sadly, there's no BIOS update to address this problem. It seems to be a persistent issue across all BIOS versions for this motherboard. > > Just to clarify did you guys co-work on this patch, or are you > submitting on behalf of wenlunpeng?  It right now shows up as you > submitting on behalf of wenlunpeng.  If you co-worked on it you should > also use a Co-Developed-by tag. No, the entirety of this bugfix is attributable to wenlunpeng. > > As this is suspected to be a BIOS issue, I would like to better > understand if the BIOS upgrade fixes it.  If it does but you would > still like a quirk for the system it should include the BIOS version > here. > > Unfortunately again. There's not much we as kernel developers can do when devices behave unpredictably. -- *WangYuli *