From: Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>, ritesh.list@gmail.com
Cc: brads@mainlining.org, chleroy@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc32/modules: Reserve a PLT entry for ftrace_regs_caller
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:40:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23E9A6DC-579A-4B62-B35C-578A8E3389BD@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <371108c3-0314-4015-9ca4-d96a11f1e597@linux.ibm.com>
On 11 November 2026 11:58:28 GMT, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
wrote:
>
>On 11/11/26 12:58 PM, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> On 11 November 2026 03:48:41 GMT, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Commit 7dfbfb87c243 ("powerpc/ftrace: Activate
>>>> HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on PPC32") made count_relocs()
>>>> undercount the PLT entries the loader
>>>> consumes: module_finalize_ftrace() now creates two trampolines
>>>> (mod->arch.tramp for ftrace_caller() and mod->arch.tramp_regs for
>>>> ftrace_regs_caller()), while count_relocs() reserves only one entry
>>>> for ftrace.
>>>>
>>>> So the core .plt ends up one ppc_plt_entry (16 bytes) short. The
>>>> walk in do_plt_call() scans for a free slot with
>>>> "while (entry->jump[0])" and has no bound check, so once the last
>>>> reserved slot is used up, the walk steps past the end of the section
>>>> and patch_instruction() writes the 4-instruction trampoline into
>>>> whatever module memory follows the .plt.
>>>>
>>>> Count the second entry, mirroring what module_64.c does for the same
>>>> pair of stubs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>> Do we also need fixes and stable tag here?
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7dfbfb87c243 ("powerpc/ftrace: Activate
>HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on PPC32")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Hmm.. could the merger add that? If anyone merges.. :(
>planned to be part of my fixes PR and will add it.
>Thanks for the fix.
No worries, mind changing sob to this email?
>
>Maddy
>>>
>>> -ritesh
>>>
>> --- Thanks!
>
--- Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 17:56 Bradley Morgan
2026-11-10 8:57 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-11-10 21:22 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-11-11 3:48 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-11-11 7:28 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-11-11 11:58 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2026-11-11 15:40 ` Bradley Morgan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23E9A6DC-579A-4B62-B35C-578A8E3389BD@linux.dev \
--to=bradley.morgan@linux.dev \
--cc=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®