mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Alessio Balsini <balsini@google.com>,
	Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/deadline: Add dl_bw_capacity()
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 12:54:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23bde551-0d91-4bfe-ce65-40af9fbfdef9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427083709.30262-4-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

On 27/04/2020 10:37, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 4ae22bfc37ae..eb23e6921d94 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,25 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
>  
>  	return cpus;
>  }
> +
> +static inline unsigned long dl_bw_capacity(int i)
> +{
> +	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
> +	unsigned long cap;
> +
> +	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
> +			 "sched RCU must be held");
> +
> +	if (cpumask_subset(rd->span, cpu_active_mask))
> +		return rd->sum_cpu_capacity;
> +
> +	cap = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
> +		cap += capacity_orig_of(i);
> +
> +	return cap;
> +}

There is an issue w/ excl. cpusets and cpuset.sched_load_balance=0. The
latter is needed to demonstrate the problem since DL task affinity can't
be altered.

A CPU in such a cpuset has its rq attached to def_root_domain which does
not have its 'sum_cpu_capacity' properly set.

root@juno:~# bash
root@juno:~# ps -eo comm,pid,class | grep bash
bash             1661 TS
bash             2040 TS
bash             2176 TS <--

root@juno:~# echo 2176 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/tasks 

root@juno:~# chrt -d --sched-runtime 8000 --sched-period 16000 -p 0 2176
chrt: failed to set pid 2176's policy: Device or resource busy

...
sched_dl_overflow: [bash 2176] task_cpu=4 cpus_ptr=2,4-5
dl_bw_capacity() CPU4 dflt_rd->sum_cpu_capacity=0 <-- !!! dflt_rd->span=2,4-5 cpu_active_mask=0-5
...

OTHA, rd->span is properly set due to 'cpumask_clear_cpu(rq->cpu,
old_rd->span) and cpumask_set_cpu(rq->cpu, rd->span)' in rq_attach_root().

It's not possible to treat 'rd->sum_cpu_capacity' like 'rd->span' since
the former changes between sched domain teardown/bringup w/ asymmetric
CPU capacity.

What could be done is to return 'dl_bw_cpus(i) << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT'
w/ symmetric CPU capacity (of 1024) and to loop over rd->span otherwise.
Latter includes symmetric cpusets w/ only little CPUs. 

---8<---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 575b7d88d839..6d17748cb7a1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -70,24 +70,28 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
 	return cpus;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long dl_bw_capacity(int i)
-{
+static inline unsigned long __dl_bw_capacity(int i) {
 	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
-	unsigned long cap;
+	unsigned long cap = 0;
 
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
 			 "sched RCU must be held");
 
-	if (cpumask_subset(rd->span, cpu_active_mask))
-		return rd->sum_cpu_capacity;
-
-	cap = 0;
-
 	for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
 		cap += capacity_orig_of(i);
 
 	return cap;
 }
+
+static inline unsigned long dl_bw_capacity(int i)
+{
+	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity) &&
+	    capacity_orig_of(i) == SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) {
+		return dl_bw_cpus(i) << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	} else {
+		return __dl_bw_capacity(i);
+	}
+}
 #else
 static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
 {
-- 
2.17.1

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27  8:37 [PATCH v2 0/6] Capacity awareness for SCHED_DEADLINE Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched/deadline: Optimize dl_bw_cpus() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 10:55   ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/deadline: Add dl_bw_capacity() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-06 10:54   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2020-05-06 12:37     ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-06 15:09       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11  8:01         ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-12 12:39           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-15 12:26             ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched/deadline: Improve admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/deadline: Make DL capacity-aware Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 13:10   ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-04  3:58       ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-05 18:02         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched/deadline: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 13:34   ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27 14:17     ` luca abeni
2020-04-29 17:39       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 11:00         ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12           ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23bde551-0d91-4bfe-ce65-40af9fbfdef9@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=balsini@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®