Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix NUMA sched domain build errors for GNR-X and CWF-X

[Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, 2025-08-25 at 09:48 +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Tim,
> 
> On 8/23/2025 1:44 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > While testing Granite Rapids X (GNR-X) and Clearwater Forest X (CWF-X) in
> > SNc-3 mode, we encountered sched domain build errors reported in dmesg.
> > Asymmetric node distances from local node to to nodes in remote package
> > was not expected by the scheduler domain code and also led to excessive
> > number of sched domain hierachy levels.
> > 
> > Fix the missing NUMA domain level set in topology_span_sane() check and
> > also simplify the distance to nodes in remote package to retain distance
> > symmetry and make the NUMA topology sane for GNR-X and CWF-X.
> 
> I did some sanity testing on an EPYC platform  on NPS2/4 and didn't
> see any changes to the sched domain layout or the sched_node_distance()
> being used when constructing them with the series.
> 
> Feel free to include:
> 
> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> 

Thanks for testing it.

Tim