From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Chen, Hu" <hu1.chen@intel.com>
Cc: bo.he@intel.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io: accel: kxcjk1013: restore the range after resume.
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:16:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23ced5ac-b0a0-7d87-76d7-bdec0c3e0e15@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190304070556.24681-1-hu1.chen@intel.com>
Hi,
On 04-03-19 08:05, Chen, Hu wrote:
> From: "he, bo" <bo.he@intel.com>
>
> On some laptops, kxcjk1013 is powered off when system enters S3. We need
> restore the range regiter during resume. Otherwise, the sensor doesn't
> work properly after S3.
>
> Signed-off-by: he, bo <bo.he@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Hu <hu1.chen@intel.com>
Thank you for the patch.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Handle return value independently in resume callback.
>
> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index 7096e577b23f..17837e26bcf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -1437,6 +1437,11 @@ static int kxcjk1013_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> ret = kxcjk1013_set_mode(data, OPERATION);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = kxcjk1013_set_range(data, data->range);
> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>
> return ret;
I'm not a fan of the extra unlock, IMHO it would be better to instead do:
mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
ret = kxcjk1013_set_mode(data, OPERATION);
if (ret == 0)
ret = kxcjk1013_set_range(data, data->range);
mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-04 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-21 3:13 [PATCH] " He, Bo
2019-03-03 16:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-03-04 7:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen, Hu
2019-03-04 9:16 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2019-03-06 2:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Chen, Hu
2019-03-06 8:43 ` Hans de Goede
2019-03-09 17:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23ced5ac-b0a0-7d87-76d7-bdec0c3e0e15@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=bo.he@intel.com \
--cc=hu1.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®