From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8765C67863 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A156920651 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:16:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A156920651 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727452AbeJWMh7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:37:59 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0249.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.249]:57753 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726764AbeJWMh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:37:58 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC61181D340F; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:16:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: crow76_1a9b1c704b316 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2453 Received: from XPS-9350 (unknown [172.56.41.163]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <23e41205115d317908c63d37a20ee316b44a8404.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8 From: Joe Perches To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , James Bottomley Cc: linux-kernel , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:16:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20181022211025.GA8911@kroah.com> References: <1540066514.3464.22.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20181022211025.GA8911@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.1-1build1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:15:14PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is the series of patches which has been discussed on both ksummit- > > discuss and linux-kernel for the past few weeks. As Shuah said when > > kicking off the process, it's designed as a starting point for the next > > phase of the discussion, not as the end point, so it's only really a > > set of minor updates to further that goal. > > > > The merger of the three patches to show the combined effect is attached > > below. However, Greg recently posted the next phase of the discussion, > > so people will be asking what the merger of the series looks like. > > Ignoring the non-CoC documents, I think it looks like this > > Sorry for not responding sooner for this, travel and the meeting today > took up my time. > > Anyway, as we discussed today in the Maintainers summit, let's leave the > Code of Conduct text alone for now. It matches what "upstream" has with > the exception of removing that one paragraph. If you have issues with > the wording in it, please work with upstream to fix the issues there as > hundreds of other projects will benefit with your changes if they are > really needed. Given the different development models, that's not a very compelling argument. As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times, I'd much rather kernel development use the debian code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one. https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct