From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752071Ab3FXJaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 05:30:08 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48845 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751160Ab3FXJaH (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 05:30:07 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Chanwoo Choi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Myungjoo Ham Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Add 'load_table' debugfs file to show accumulated data of CPUs Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:39:30 +0200 Message-ID: <24083337.GLRAoa2hpo@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.10.0-rc5+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1371716524-19370-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <5527616.jZ71Fx7IV6@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:48:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 21 June 2013 18:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, to be honest, I don't like the whole thing. The more changes you need > > to make to the common code to support it, the worse. > > You meant you didn't like this patch completely? Or the idea that > I gave? Well, kind of both ... > Getting the new frequency would be very useful IMHO. That would > give us a relation between old/new freq and load on each cpu at > that time. That's why I suggested it. Where "us" is user space or what? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.