From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD1ACCA473 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 01:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230366AbiFYBPu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:15:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229450AbiFYBPt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:15:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78FB03ED2C; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id t21so3966927pfq.1; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:15:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mddgUzjjMvwn6t+jkp7452qXuMD9uxs9pKqRGpWnzls=; b=MFL75ZqSwniQVJ/Tg712PAfFoFZvNdUvvD/hHpnQShNFY/kvSnWnwMdGXuyFf6363F InG8hiCJoMElYT0AYLFk9kwgttuBvSDgybhQeiOQSCJKXX7iV9NMaIVeA5V9HKkFeyQi D0pv5Lh1cd1gjsl3hfadEOgKyegWuS6L4pjyOtchRD5G9RUb13fE+AayBbCz7dHeQ5ij uDeIqmpxmzTFTUuU+wOTF4t+Z39oVUZh8SbygfhA9E5qr/MauwsO8C2xNOkzSUls3mnD vdAhHP+ZGW5AWfuw6h3b3c4IyhkmWRsf0OR7t7/VRE3UVfFSEnuj/z6yN4gDae0XzvgM KMsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mddgUzjjMvwn6t+jkp7452qXuMD9uxs9pKqRGpWnzls=; b=Xx1C5wc9CAHLyRPp3h/8HT0uq1n4DXhx3fAg049UgsHbL6q1ie41LV0VVYE+6CFhqx ZXvHz+1RiPu8+vBYrCgWGvuYYNvzJRc4qmO1N2ODyXJKiMBCAPe7Q1V1qBQRxnZNGSzt m03wLfbSaMd2Pv3vA98/HAnQGaiHFhaClP2fkovRX2bPVvJgR28ez/MIl6IAtPY1HUK+ jxx2mo4+OOH+zcUJBCKLqEMr9bU54stup6zaGfGO+sgFPb694I5wL2HXWqpqCLhhE0QL 8wpjmCsCOUZPYu4IUGEjW9Sz/0ER/xvO/TPBt0GYkd+vYC6qKsdOZdBiEZ9ju4kdDumj BTNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/KfeoevwP8tngjw4Qqq8rd2tQKtMZIhjtd825kBGPKOfm44o4J yUlU+vUqg87Bb5QDwMYd0eQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tyD3JHAlSkBQre22ZgvMm1Os5Ag+84SUDLVbeBfB3j6RW5jvPKEfdDHIPvu+CHWDALZaL72A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6b08:0:b0:3fd:1b8e:3932 with SMTP id g8-20020a636b08000000b003fd1b8e3932mr1481851pgc.552.1656119747744; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs09a-223-255-225-71.three.co.id. [223.255.225.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d76-20020a621d4f000000b005255151e248sm2433430pfd.174.2022.06.24.18.15.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <241393bf-1fd3-ab25-867b-7132d7590aa8@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 08:15:43 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: docs: Modify the section of User xattr Content-Language: en-US To: Deming Wang , miklos@szeredi.hu, corbet@lwn.net Cc: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220624014605.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: <20220624014605.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/24/22 08:46, Deming Wang wrote: > Delete duplicate words of "the". > I think "Modify something" isn't clear subject, because reviewers don't know at glance the logical change this patch is doing other than actually reading the diff below. For the patch message, what about "Remove duplicate the"? In this case of trivial patch, it's OK to have the patch message same as the subject, if the message can't be described more concise but clearer. > @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ can be removed. > User xattr > ---------- > > -The the "-o userxattr" mount option forces overlayfs to use the > +The "-o userxattr" mount option forces overlayfs to use the > "user.overlay." xattr namespace instead of "trusted.overlay.". This is > useful for unprivileged mounting of overlayfs. > The diff looks OK. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara