From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753349AbbJYKur (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:50:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:37141 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbbJYKun (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:50:43 -0400 Message-ID: <245c494679a40e4187287daa23e1e274.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <4607478.zVSfzXyPzA@wuerfel> References: <1441205138-12664-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <1441205138-12664-7-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <2dce3d8d918e124eb29afa7a59607bca.squirrel@codeaurora.org> <4607478.zVSfzXyPzA@wuerfel> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:50:42 -0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device From: ygardi@codeaurora.org To: "Arnd Bergmann" Cc: subhashj@codeaurora.org, "Yaniv Gardi" , robherring2@gmail.com, james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, pebolle@tiscali.nl, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org, gbroner@codeaurora.org, draviv@codeaurora.org, "Rob Herring" , "Pawel Moll" , "Mark Rutland" , "Ian Campbell" , "Kumar Gala" , "Vinayak Holikatti" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Sujit Reddy Thumma" , "Raviv Shvili" , "Sahitya Tummala" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Thursday 22 October 2015 07:02:14 subhashj@codeaurora.org wrote: >> > >> > Required properties: >> > -- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" >> > +- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" or >> > + "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" or "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" >> >> Are we really using these "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" or "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" >> compatible string anywhere? > > We should list them in either case, but it could be clarified as: > > compatible : must contain "jedec,ufs-1.1", may also list one or more > of the following: > "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" > "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" > "qcom,ufshc" > > Arnd > Shortly i will upload an updated v8. Yaniv