From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755202Ab3AUNXg (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:23:36 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48229 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753331Ab3AUNXf (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:23:35 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Olivier Doucet Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Performance issue since 3.2.6 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:29:33 +0100 Message-ID: <2462618.rQxKXSuBtr@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc4; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1396763.8sOcKf8eSO@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, January 21, 2013 02:18:29 PM Olivier Doucet wrote: > Hello, > > 2013/1/18 Rafael J. Wysocki : > > It looks like the value returned by pm_qos_request() with CONFIG_PM unset > > for PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY is not the right one. > > FYI, I benchmarked a new version with : > CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y > CONFIG_PM=y > > but the performance loss is still present. In that case it is not quite likely that the commit you bisected to really introduced the problem, because it doesn't change things for CONFIG_PM=y. Does reverting that commit still help? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.