From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760319AbdAKVOU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:14:20 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:55976 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756490AbdAKVNh (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:13:37 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nikita Yushchenko Cc: Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Bjorn Helgaas , fkan@apm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artemi Ivanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: avoid increasing DMA masks above what hardware supports Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <2489599.dXme8sRkvp@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1484159512-28515-3-git-send-email-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> References: <1484159512-28515-1-git-send-email-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> <1484159512-28515-3-git-send-email-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ssgC7VFIpFQNkBbBfpJbRqtAJOG3NMkFfxr4TayXk7kZa2Q37Qw G6Gvm8ROQ2yptg8MfeRfoT4bSQsSPllOJcJ6xpcEMsb7pyZPBxfhvJS2Upra4doIgKGN38o ersY02EkRtGGMXiS0sCrvv38l7lRRKVwQ6lJa1ZnZn9y7jDsiUszc28EhnVNw6UHeO/HWH0 RvUazYu74dnAeLpw8qBxw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:5wFVN9jBaf0=:GTB4xBSo3j089YeFPdsIue Asgk+iJ+cHWR/2IONxRp4aZM75iN7yeUAKfqaBJRR9VUjaAbezFKsHCgSBdxTYkdyoCD4noD6 QlZL7tHfrjZeZWNUJRxBDTPcHK0ryapAX9dCRYMm1Mv5diRNyCJpS0pJ/yOmmNwvyPbBv7rzD NNvZNX5vMALxfH4ROWNfQMaIgx66HZd7QRNUweBDzjV1jqr2JWViE43ZFEJjSFEKMAgjasZDL 8gIKAJaGG6EzuKWHihxtWuoGfEpy60VNN5LG/H5DUWpK0TUt9Ibt8LJTaK+2Yc7+9Fve4D5Nc nzUXIuz8U7Mlb4J0rSN+YshZ5AhhlGh83MYqZGZ1+/YDUpGaXn0SoU/TmepLk2Y5FaPYWit0k AZSQKUyvlEy40YqvTKpb9YvKtsNBQf5bEOOC+MoJUNHIMi8Hcmj71xoacghh63carOQe77HTS vF357SJx8whNORYsG/eMW2KqT3/tAr7rM7FI1nkleVczWOFchkfzrqOobHGRpDHRCh2Xo2v2X giz4OdRMxas9Nepn4X7coIHcrHldD4eVshfl8tVfVBcrAmCKz2MMlH7P5sCLdLz2rbboR2FgV fYhmuqLKSFmnVlcEd2mQU0sDurMKslt0CaS/pogKTKm5oww1Ero5M47HDaGVXYpYID07XqHp4 4KtJtqIavtByW+vt6bdU//7ZyIkBBOZEonP+RMSlcUbMtlXvlcPzVhhuQS115fjDz9zsifv1I EvL4iGNzdsUYJX/A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 9:31:52 PM CET Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > @@ -959,6 +990,15 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, > if (!dev->archdata.dma_ops) > dev->archdata.dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops; > > + /* > + * Whatever the parent bus can set. A device must not set > + * a DMA mask larger than this. > + */ > + if (enforce_range) > + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = size - 1; > + else > + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64); > + > dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent; > __iommu_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu); > Could we just pass the mask instead of the size here? Arnd