From: "Nagendra, Bhavana" <bhavana.nagendra@amd.com>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Deguara,
Joachim" <joachim.deguara@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86_64: remove check for CONSTANT_TSC from time.c
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:23:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <249EE4DE927F114DBDC077FFA4A34DC701B3C700@SAUSEXMB3.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070604204157.GB22013@amd.com>
Yes, the attached patch works for me. Andi, is this patch acceptable?
Regards,
--
Bhavana Nagendra
AMD, Inc
-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joerg.roedel@amd.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:42 PM
To: Andi Kleen
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Deguara, Joachim; Nagendra, Bhavana
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: remove check for CONSTANT_TSC from time.c
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:02:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2007 19:49, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> >
> > This patch removes the check for the CONSTANT_TSC cpu flag from
time.c
> > on the x86_64 architecture. At the time this flag is checked at boot
the
> > cpu init code was yet not executed and thus the check fails. At this
> > point the check for VENDOR_AMD and cpu family 0x10 is sufficient.
>
> Wrong fix. The bit just needs to be set earlier in early cpu detect.
Otherwise
> there is a problem again with the next constant TSC AMD CPU.
> I will do that.
>
> -Andi
Ok. But I assume you are meaning something like the attached diff?
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe,
Thomas McCoy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-04 17:49 Joerg Roedel
2007-06-04 18:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 20:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2007-06-04 22:23 ` Nagendra, Bhavana [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=249EE4DE927F114DBDC077FFA4A34DC701B3C700@SAUSEXMB3.amd.com \
--to=bhavana.nagendra@amd.com \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®