Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qusb2: Document IPQ9574 compatible

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>]

On 27/03/2023 12:30, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Document the compatible string used for the qusb2 phy in IPQ9574.
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
> 
> ---
>   Changes in v4:
> 	- Remove constraints not applicable to IPQ9574

I don't think this is a correct way to go

>   Changes in v3:
> 	- Maintain the proper sorted order
> 
>   Changes in v2:
> 	- Moved ipq6018 to the proper place and placed ipq9574
> 	  next to it as suggested by Dmitry
> ---
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml
> index 7f403e7..3cb27da 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml
> @@ -18,13 +18,14 @@ properties:
>       oneOf:
>         - items:
>             - enum:
> +              - qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,ipq8074-qusb2-phy
> +              - qcom,ipq9574-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,msm8953-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,msm8996-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,msm8998-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,qcm2290-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,sdm660-qusb2-phy
> -              - qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,sm4250-qusb2-phy
>                 - qcom,sm6115-qusb2-phy
>         - items:
> @@ -157,9 +158,6 @@ required:
>     - "#phy-cells"
>     - clocks
>     - clock-names
> -  - vdd-supply
> -  - vdda-pll-supply
> -  - vdda-phy-dpdm-supply

So, how does ipq9574 power on the PHY?

>     - resets
>   
>   allOf:

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry