From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B06C678DB for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 08:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229822AbjBXIml (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 03:42:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229829AbjBXImb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 03:42:31 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D156531E for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:42:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id bt28so6444244wrb.8 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:42:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vBx9UiFMgKx7MHfRBNSO2Ju8FpSd91OMyvhN2TPtMOk=; b=VTNmmztNn6X7ALS6Sx0lpZfz5QE5Kb5S+TspEibgAIE/iT0cP1vAID5pwQNIWRd/dO B9/hZhd8GFtCoZsxM1YVEkNdxOWyv1DbEStHtFDf1b9YixNoUBPA3QZK8S5IYfZoo2Kz FVNi/V3u4kXlqO2oimZTA3Mm0tfYnuqpazRZBrR1ycB+cbDgKXtmjkXT3+OnPqvC/phq v3EkuX4cKtvgyCpGvzIlsfxJBHO4C/HQPMY4pPDpxz4McM1CZiLeLqZM5Ma4vUQhoAHQ 2CNq1v5CklsoYIyUzpB6Mv+XXYlobR+TUrT1H2S3s7ti8Pz497m0MQKmBY8calgUj44O 59CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vBx9UiFMgKx7MHfRBNSO2Ju8FpSd91OMyvhN2TPtMOk=; b=mBhE30Qas9hwTs3riWkEeq0Trp8XhBwjMPzeOEN8XdU9aoES5pwcjO1NazdFrrS87B o9ocjKrv5YyqYPCRKFfN9GpzHGtuVSVuLQCZVivg2BiI/ZXqGbmQt5Qvdxqquk54cQRv nw6ch9EMB1ellx0rhQiD8GFc/qnD/YbxY1I3yqeh7zPuzwtCN+4WpPwyU5HZb8XqRThk RrLEI4XLagVAQXarIfKiUkT+sY+dpBqJ4IDUDqQlKKUkEl3i/anj3SnYyi/UriwEfsIR V5TG4JXwl7F9/0YLx2HJNEGYHBfXvny3q2DFWhFFp1piAE9Q2fe2CxIxf4gQV71LzwGW qI5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWMrPcXDS4QpLhtWpHw3+vQXkAGudCdCD/azwJlxcJgxoYBwNBf v0+9Ei/ew8BlOjHolatAWgJ5Hw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/65mnX3b6cw7jED41bV+vyvQWAktq4fQUhk3c70Aomjf0BMQi4v0uEJqBaftt77pGW8E8t6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4dd1:0:b0:2c7:a39:6e30 with SMTP id f17-20020a5d4dd1000000b002c70a396e30mr7203011wru.38.1677228141463; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:42:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.216.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a16-20020adffb90000000b002c54c92e125sm11258156wrr.46.2023.02.24.00.42.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:42:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <24d1b652-e3bc-5638-facb-231a4bcaf9c6@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:42:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/8] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low property Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Walleij , =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring Cc: Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , soc@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20221226123630.6515-1-pali@kernel.org> <20221226123630.6515-2-pali@kernel.org> <20230223164833.bsaqwgevphnsenal@pali> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/02/2023 21:59, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Thursday 23 February 2023 14:22:52 Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Pali Rohár wrote: >>>> >>>>> Allow to define inverted logic (0 - enable LED, 1 - disable LED) via >>>>> active-low property. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár >>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 5 +++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> Needs a DT Ack (now Cc:ed) >>> >>> I can't do anything with this set until we have a DT Ack. >>> >>> If you don't receive one soon, I'd suggest resending the set again with >>> all of the DT people on Cc that it should have been sent to in the first >>> place. >> >> (Re)Sending one email multiple times is against email etiquette, >> moreover it is spam technique and reason for marking sender on the >> blacklist. > > No problem on the kernel mailing lists actually, we love to mail > bomb each other here. Yeah maybe we are a bit weird :/ > >> Moreover I have already sent it more than one time. DT people are known >> to not respond to patches and pull requests and I have no motivation to >> send reminder emails for them for more than half of year. Is this a joke? You got here response within one day! Sent: 18th of August Reviewed-by: 19th of August https://lore.kernel.org/all/f635d5a7-6817-cd62-e395-63e346775716@linaro.org/ You ignored the tag and then ignored the process and not Cc'ed us. Yet you complain that someone did not respond to your emails. Really? >> >> So I would suggest to not send emails to people who just do not want to >> receive or read emails. It is logical reaction. >> >> This patch is here for more than 6 months, so I do not see reason why to >> wait for Godot. Rather move forward than stepping at the same position. > > I understand that it is annoying. > > In my experience Krzysztof and Rob (now added on To) are usually > quite responsive and helpful, so something must have made them > miss it I think. > > As subsystem maintainer, if the DT reviewers haven't said anything > in ~2 weeks I tend to sanity check the binding as best I can and then > merge it. The bigger and more complex it is the more hesitant I get to > do this... Yeah... this patch was never sent to us, thus regardless how hard we work, it would be quite difficult to answer emails which we never received. Best regards, Krzysztof